TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic and structural differences between heme oxygenase-1 and -2 are due to differences in their C-terminal regions
AU - Kochert, Brent A.
AU - Fleischhacker, Angela S.
AU - Wales, Thomas E.
AU - Becker, Donald F.
AU - Engen, John R.
AU - Ragsdale, Stephen W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-GM123513 (to S. W. R.) and P30GM103335 and GM061068 (to D. F. B.) and a research collaboration with Waters Corp. (to J. R. E.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Kochert et al. Published under exclusive license by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
PY - 2019/5/17
Y1 - 2019/5/17
N2 - Heme oxygenase (HO) catalyzes heme degradation, a process crucial for regulating cellular levels of this vital, but cytotoxic, cofactor. Two HO isoforms, HO1 and HO2, exhibit similar catalytic mechanisms and efficiencies. They also share catalytic core structures, including the heme-binding site. Outside their catalytic cores are two regions unique to HO2: a 20-amino acid- long N-terminal extension and a C-terminal domain containing two heme regulatory motifs (HRMs) that bind heme independently of the core. Both HO isoforms contain a C-terminal hydrophobic membrane anchor; however, their sequences diverge. Here, using hydrogen-deuterium exchange MS, sizeexclusion chromatography, and sedimentation velocity, we investigated how these divergent regions impact the dynamics and structure of the apo and heme-bound forms of HO1 and HO2. Our results reveal that heme binding to the catalytic cores of HO1 and HO2 causes similar dynamic and structural changes in regions (proximal, distal, and A6 helices) within and linked to the heme pocket. We observed that full-length HO2 is more dynamic than truncated forms lacking the membrane-anchoring region, despite sharing the same steady-state activity and heme-binding properties. In contrast, the membrane anchor of HO1did not influence its dynamics. Furthermore, although residues within the HRM domain facilitated HO2 dimerization, neither theHRMregion nor the N-terminal extension appeared to affect HO2 dynamics. In summary, our results highlight significant dynamic and structural differences between HO2 and HO1and indicate that their dissimilar C-terminal regions play a major role in controlling the structural dynamics of these two proteins.
AB - Heme oxygenase (HO) catalyzes heme degradation, a process crucial for regulating cellular levels of this vital, but cytotoxic, cofactor. Two HO isoforms, HO1 and HO2, exhibit similar catalytic mechanisms and efficiencies. They also share catalytic core structures, including the heme-binding site. Outside their catalytic cores are two regions unique to HO2: a 20-amino acid- long N-terminal extension and a C-terminal domain containing two heme regulatory motifs (HRMs) that bind heme independently of the core. Both HO isoforms contain a C-terminal hydrophobic membrane anchor; however, their sequences diverge. Here, using hydrogen-deuterium exchange MS, sizeexclusion chromatography, and sedimentation velocity, we investigated how these divergent regions impact the dynamics and structure of the apo and heme-bound forms of HO1 and HO2. Our results reveal that heme binding to the catalytic cores of HO1 and HO2 causes similar dynamic and structural changes in regions (proximal, distal, and A6 helices) within and linked to the heme pocket. We observed that full-length HO2 is more dynamic than truncated forms lacking the membrane-anchoring region, despite sharing the same steady-state activity and heme-binding properties. In contrast, the membrane anchor of HO1did not influence its dynamics. Furthermore, although residues within the HRM domain facilitated HO2 dimerization, neither theHRMregion nor the N-terminal extension appeared to affect HO2 dynamics. In summary, our results highlight significant dynamic and structural differences between HO2 and HO1and indicate that their dissimilar C-terminal regions play a major role in controlling the structural dynamics of these two proteins.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066117160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066117160&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008592
DO - 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008592
M3 - Article
C2 - 30944174
AN - SCOPUS:85066117160
SN - 0021-9258
VL - 294
SP - 8259
EP - 8272
JO - Journal of Biological Chemistry
JF - Journal of Biological Chemistry
IS - 20
ER -