TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of digital highlighting on reading comprehension given text-to-speech technology for people with aphasia
AU - Brown, Jessica A.
AU - Knollman-Porter, Kelly
AU - Hux, Karen
AU - Wallace, Sarah E.
AU - Deville, Camille
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors received funding in the form of salary support from the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under award number 1R15DC015579 to support completion of this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Many people with aphasia have a strong desire to participate in reading activities despite persistent reading challenges. Digital reading devices and text-to-speech (TTS) technology are increasing in popularity and have the potential to help people with aphasia. Systematic investigation of modifiable TTS features provides a means of exploring this potential. Aims: This study’s aim was to evaluate the effect of digital highlighting synchronised with TTS auditory and written output on reading comprehension by people with aphasia and to determine their highlighting preferences. Methods & Procedures: This work was registered with clinicaltrials.gov and assigned the clinical trial registry number 01446 r prior to initiation of data collection. Twenty-five adults with aphasia read and listened to passages presented in three synchronised highlighting conditions: sentence highlighting, single word highlighting, and no highlighting. Participants answered comprehension questions, selected most and least preferred conditions, and provided feedback explaining highlighting preferences. Outcome & Results: Comprehension accuracy did not vary significantly across presentation conditions, but participants preferred either single word or sentence highlighting over no highlighting. Conclusions: Neither word nor sentence highlighting benefitted or hindered comprehension by people with aphasia as a group, but individual differences may occur. Clinicians should attend to personal preferences when implementing digital highlighting as a reading support strategy.
AB - Background: Many people with aphasia have a strong desire to participate in reading activities despite persistent reading challenges. Digital reading devices and text-to-speech (TTS) technology are increasing in popularity and have the potential to help people with aphasia. Systematic investigation of modifiable TTS features provides a means of exploring this potential. Aims: This study’s aim was to evaluate the effect of digital highlighting synchronised with TTS auditory and written output on reading comprehension by people with aphasia and to determine their highlighting preferences. Methods & Procedures: This work was registered with clinicaltrials.gov and assigned the clinical trial registry number 01446 r prior to initiation of data collection. Twenty-five adults with aphasia read and listened to passages presented in three synchronised highlighting conditions: sentence highlighting, single word highlighting, and no highlighting. Participants answered comprehension questions, selected most and least preferred conditions, and provided feedback explaining highlighting preferences. Outcome & Results: Comprehension accuracy did not vary significantly across presentation conditions, but participants preferred either single word or sentence highlighting over no highlighting. Conclusions: Neither word nor sentence highlighting benefitted or hindered comprehension by people with aphasia as a group, but individual differences may occur. Clinicians should attend to personal preferences when implementing digital highlighting as a reading support strategy.
KW - Reading comprehension
KW - aphasia
KW - highlighting
KW - multimodality presentation
KW - text-to-speech conversion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087562329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087562329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02687038.2020.1787728
DO - 10.1080/02687038.2020.1787728
M3 - Article
C2 - 33731970
AN - SCOPUS:85087562329
SN - 0268-7038
VL - 35
SP - 200
EP - 221
JO - Aphasiology
JF - Aphasiology
IS - 2
ER -