TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Automaticity Training on Reading Performance
T2 - A Meta-Analysis
AU - Cooper, Samantha
AU - Hebert, Michael
AU - Goodrich, J. Marc
AU - Leiva, Sergio
AU - Lin, Xin
AU - Peng, Peng
AU - Nelson, J. Ron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall effects of automaticity training of fundamental literacy component skills (i.e., letter names/sounds, individual words) on reading fluency and comprehension. Another purpose was to assess if the effects of automaticity training varied for reading fluency and comprehension. We identified 11 research studies involving students in Grades 1–6 that met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. A total of 83 effect sizes (Hedges g, corrected for sample size bias) were extracted from these studies. These studies were double-coded for specific features (e.g., student age, student grade, type of automaticity training). We meta-analyzed the effect sizes using a multi-level meta-analytic model and examined whether the outcome measure type (comprehension or fluency) moderated the effects of automaticity training. We also analyzed for publication bias. The overall effect size for automaticity training of fundamental literacy component skills on reading fluency and comprehension was 0.28, although it was not statistically significant. Shifting units of analysis approach indicated there was a statistically significant effect found for reading fluency outcomes [g = 0.48 (CI =.23,.72)] but not for reading comprehension (ES = 0.17 ns). Limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.
AB - The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the overall effects of automaticity training of fundamental literacy component skills (i.e., letter names/sounds, individual words) on reading fluency and comprehension. Another purpose was to assess if the effects of automaticity training varied for reading fluency and comprehension. We identified 11 research studies involving students in Grades 1–6 that met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. A total of 83 effect sizes (Hedges g, corrected for sample size bias) were extracted from these studies. These studies were double-coded for specific features (e.g., student age, student grade, type of automaticity training). We meta-analyzed the effect sizes using a multi-level meta-analytic model and examined whether the outcome measure type (comprehension or fluency) moderated the effects of automaticity training. We also analyzed for publication bias. The overall effect size for automaticity training of fundamental literacy component skills on reading fluency and comprehension was 0.28, although it was not statistically significant. Shifting units of analysis approach indicated there was a statistically significant effect found for reading fluency outcomes [g = 0.48 (CI =.23,.72)] but not for reading comprehension (ES = 0.17 ns). Limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.
KW - Automaticity training
KW - Fundamental literacy component skills
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Reading comprehension
KW - Reading fluency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135557473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135557473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10864-022-09480-7
DO - 10.1007/s10864-022-09480-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135557473
SN - 1053-0819
VL - 33
SP - 23
EP - 52
JO - Journal of Behavioral Education
JF - Journal of Behavioral Education
IS - 1
ER -