TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of sensory and behavioral substitutes following an experimentally induced stressor among abstinent smokeless tobacco users
AU - Prensky, Eric H.
AU - Cohen, Lee M.
AU - McChargue, Dennis
AU - Gao, Weihua
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Despite the well-known health risks associated with smokeless tobacco use, much is unresolved with respect to effective treatment for use of this substance. The present study examined the impact of a nicotine-free smokeless tobacco substitute and confectionary chewing gum on craving, withdrawal, and anxiety among 24 smokeless tobacco users following 24 hours of nicotine abstinence and a laboratory stressor. Although chewing gum did not impact withdrawal, craving, or anxiety compared to a no-product control condition, smokeless tobacco substitute administration resulted in a reduction of withdrawal and craving levels compared to the control condition following 24 hours of abstinence. Furthermore, significantly lower levels of craving and withdrawal were observed in both smokeless tobacco and smokeless tobacco substitute conditions compared to the control condition following the stressor. Results indicate that although general oral stimulation (eg, chewing gum) was not effective in reducing symptoms related to nicotine withdrawal, smokeless tobacco substitute use appears to be helpful in reducing withdrawal levels post-stressor. These data suggest that use of a smokeless tobacco substitute may be an effective aid in helping individuals wishing to quit, especially when managing stressors.
AB - Despite the well-known health risks associated with smokeless tobacco use, much is unresolved with respect to effective treatment for use of this substance. The present study examined the impact of a nicotine-free smokeless tobacco substitute and confectionary chewing gum on craving, withdrawal, and anxiety among 24 smokeless tobacco users following 24 hours of nicotine abstinence and a laboratory stressor. Although chewing gum did not impact withdrawal, craving, or anxiety compared to a no-product control condition, smokeless tobacco substitute administration resulted in a reduction of withdrawal and craving levels compared to the control condition following 24 hours of abstinence. Furthermore, significantly lower levels of craving and withdrawal were observed in both smokeless tobacco and smokeless tobacco substitute conditions compared to the control condition following the stressor. Results indicate that although general oral stimulation (eg, chewing gum) was not effective in reducing symptoms related to nicotine withdrawal, smokeless tobacco substitute use appears to be helpful in reducing withdrawal levels post-stressor. These data suggest that use of a smokeless tobacco substitute may be an effective aid in helping individuals wishing to quit, especially when managing stressors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77149165442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77149165442&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2009.00019.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2009.00019.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20163384
AN - SCOPUS:77149165442
SN - 1055-0496
VL - 19
SP - 128
EP - 135
JO - American Journal on Addictions
JF - American Journal on Addictions
IS - 2
ER -