TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Token Manipulation on Responding within a Token Economy Implemented with Children with Autism
AU - Sleiman, Andressa A.
AU - Betz, Alison M.
AU - Rey, Catalina N.
AU - Blackman, Abigail L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Association for Behavior Analysis International.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Token economies are an effective behavior-management tool used across multiple populations and settings. However, researchers have shown that several variables may impact its effectiveness (Hackenberg 2009, 2018). One variable within a token economy that has not been thoroughly studied is token manipulation or the extent to which the learner physically manipulates a tangible token. Thus, the current study compared the effectiveness of a token economy when participants physically manipulated tokens (token manipulation) to when the experimenter manipulated the tokens (no manipulation). In addition, we evaluated participant preference between the two conditions (i.e., token manipulation and no manipulation). The results showed higher rates of the target response during the no token manipulation condition for one participant, while no differences were observed for the other two participants. Two participants preferred the token manipulation condition, whereas the other participant showed no preference.
AB - Token economies are an effective behavior-management tool used across multiple populations and settings. However, researchers have shown that several variables may impact its effectiveness (Hackenberg 2009, 2018). One variable within a token economy that has not been thoroughly studied is token manipulation or the extent to which the learner physically manipulates a tangible token. Thus, the current study compared the effectiveness of a token economy when participants physically manipulated tokens (token manipulation) to when the experimenter manipulated the tokens (no manipulation). In addition, we evaluated participant preference between the two conditions (i.e., token manipulation and no manipulation). The results showed higher rates of the target response during the no token manipulation condition for one participant, while no differences were observed for the other two participants. Two participants preferred the token manipulation condition, whereas the other participant showed no preference.
KW - Autism
KW - Schedule of reinforcement
KW - Token economy
KW - Token reinforcement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089016945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089016945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s43494-020-00014-2
DO - 10.1007/s43494-020-00014-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089016945
SN - 0748-8491
VL - 43
SP - 323
EP - 333
JO - Education and Treatment of Children
JF - Education and Treatment of Children
IS - 4
ER -