Emergent cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement in critically ill patients with emergent calculous cholecystitis

Bradley R. Hall, Priscila R. Armijo, Crystal Krause, Tyler Burnett, Dmitry Oleynikov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The role of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is undefined in patients with multiple comorbidities presenting with emergent calculous cholecystitis (CC). This study compared outcomes between PC, laparoscopic (LC), and open cholecystectomy (OC). Methods: The Vizient UHC database was queried for high-risk patients with CC who underwent PC, LC, OC, or laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy (CONV). Demographics, outcomes, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and direct cost were compared between the groups. Results: LC was the most common approach with the lowest risk of death, complications, LOS, and cost. Complication risk was highest in OC. Nearly 20% of patients underwent PC. Complication rate, LOS, infection, aspiration pneumonia, and mortality were higher in PC. Direct cost was lowest in LC, followed by CONV, PC, and OC. Conclusions: Emergent cholecystectomy for CC in high-risk patients is safer and more cost effective than PC and this study supports the use of cholecystectomy as the primary treatment approach in these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-119
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume216
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Cholecystectomy
  • Cholecystitis
  • Cholecystostomy
  • Cost
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Emergent cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement in critically ill patients with emergent calculous cholecystitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this