@article{8eb14c7d624c4b9d8cd8a1b49b592471,
title = "Encouraging farmers' participation in the Conservation Stewardship Program: A field experiment",
abstract = "In this paper we present the results of a field experiment on encouraging farmers' application for agri-environmental schemes, specifically the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) that is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture at the state level. We sent different versions of a recruitment/enrollment letter to agricultural producers in 36 Nebraska counties with historically very low levels of CSP enrollment. We found that the letters doubled the uptake rates as compared to the control (no letter) population. Personalized letters with a handwritten phrase appealing to people's empathetic tendencies toward environmental conservation – an empathy nudge – had the largest impact. When the same nudge was photocopied, it performed statistically significantly worse than handwritten and somewhat (statistically insignificant) worse than a standard letter. The experimental results suggest that the USDA can double the application rate at a cost of only $58–116 per farm. If the money spent on sending letters were instead directed toward increasing financial incentives, it would be cost-equivalent to adding 2.5–5 cents per acre per year to CSP payments. During the time of the experiment, the CSP payments in the state were on average $6.8/acre for rangeland and $24/acre for cropland per year, and extra 2.5–5 cents per acre per year is unlikely to affect the decision of a farmer to apply. As such, from an agri-environmental policy perspective, using personalized letters is highly cost effective.",
keywords = "Agri-environmental schemes, Conservation Stewardship Program, Dual-interest, Empathy conservation, Environmental conservation, Nudging",
author = "Czap, {Natalia V.} and Czap, {Hans J.} and Simanti Banerjee and Burbach, {Mark E.}",
note = "Funding Information: We are very grateful to John Mayberger, the CSP Program Specialist from the Nebraska office of NRCS, for his cooperation on this project. We also want to thank UNL Professor Emeritus Gary D. Lynne for inspiring, encouraging and supporting our work. We thank Paul Ferraro and Kent Messer for their help with refining the design of the field experiment. Special thanks to UM-Dearborn Professor Emeritus John Gillespie for his help with the power analysis. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the Advances with Field Experiments, CBEAR-MAAP, Midwestern Economics Association and the SABE/IAREP conferences. We are very grateful to the participants of the conferences for their comments helping to improve our paper. Special thanks are to Daniel Hellerstein from USDA-ERS for his comments. The field experiment was funded by a grant from the USDA Center for Behavioral & Experimental Agri-Environmental Research (CBEAR) to UNL and UM-Dearborn. The pilot experiment was funded through the Nebraska NRCS cooperative agreement “NRCS Conservation Programs (Including CSP) Cooperative Agreement” (No. 68-6526-2-828) and through the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (award # 2012-70002-19387) to CAFIO-PRG of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Funding Information: The field experiment was funded by a grant from the USDA Center for Behavioral & Experimental Agri-Environmental Research (CBEAR) to UNL and UM-Dearborn. The pilot experiment was funded through the Nebraska NRCS cooperative agreement “NRCS Conservation Programs (Including CSP) Cooperative Agreement” (No. 68-6526-2-828 ) and through the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (award # 2012-70002-19387 ) to CAFIO-PRG of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "161",
pages = "130--143",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
}