Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: Comparison of risks

S. Claiborne Johnston, Charles B. Wilson, Van V. Halbach, Randall T. Higashida, Christopher F. Dowd, Michael W. McDermott, Carol B. Applebury, Thomas L. Farley, Daryl R. Gress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

197 Scopus citations

Abstract

Unruptured cerebral aneurysms are commonly treated by surgical clipping, but endovascular coil embolization is increasingly employed as an alternative. In a blinded review of unruptured aneurysms treated at our institution since 1990, we identified patients whose aneurysms were judged to be treatable by both neurosurgeons and neurointerventional radiologists. A change in Rankin Scale score of 2 or more from hospital admission to discharge, indicating a new moderate disability or worse, was predefined as the primary outcome measure. Long-term follow-up was obtained by mailed questionnaire and telephone interview. Length of stay and hospital charges were totaled for all hospitalizations, including follow-up. Sixty-eight patients treated surgically and 62 patients treated with endovascular coil embolization were considered candidates for either procedure on blinded review, and overall anticipated procedure risk was rated as identical. A larger proportion of patients in the surgical group developed a change in Rankin Scale score of 2 or more (25% of surgical patients vs 8% of endovascular patients). Total length of stay was longer (mean days: 7.7 for surgical patients vs 5.0 for endovascular patients) and hospital charges were greater (mean, $38,000 for surgical patients vs $33,400 for endovascular patients) for the surgical patients. At follow-up, an average of 3.9 years after the procedure, surgical patients were more likely to report persistent new symptoms or disability since treatment (34% of surgical patients vs 8% of endovascular patients) and a longer period for recovery to normal (50% returning to normal in I year for surgery and in 27 days for coil embolization). Coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms seems to be associated with significantly fewer complications than surgical clipping. More long-term data on aneurysm rupture rates are required to confirm efficacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Neurology
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: Comparison of risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Johnston, S. C., Wilson, C. B., Halbach, V. V., Higashida, R. T., Dowd, C. F., McDermott, M. W., Applebury, C. B., Farley, T. L., & Gress, D. R. (2000). Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: Comparison of risks. Annals of Neurology, 48(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/1531-8249(200007)48:1<11::AID-ANA4>3.0.CO;2-V