Energy expenditure and gait characteristics of a bilateral amputee walking with C-leg prostheses compared with stubby and conventional articulating prostheses

Jacquelin Perry, Judith M. Burnfield, Craig J. Newsam, Phil Conley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Perry J, Burnfield JM, Newsam CJ, Conley P. Energy expenditure and gait characteristics of a bilateral amputee walking with C-Leg prostheses compared with stubby and conventional articulating prostheses. To compare energy cost and stride characteristics during walking with 3 different types of prostheses in a person with bilateral knee disarticulations. Single-case study. Pathokinesiology laboratory. A subject with bilateral knee disarticulations and bilateral transradial amputations secondary to meningococcemia with purpura fulminans. Not applicable. Energy cost, stride characteristics, and motion analysis. When wearing the C-Leg prostheses, the subject walked the farthest and fastest, with an overall lower rate of oxygen consumption and oxygen cost compared with walking with either of the other prostheses. Gait analysis while the patient was wearing the C-Leg prostheses revealed premature hip extension, absence of knee flexion during loading response, and a rate of swing in the referent range. Walking in a C-leg was the most efficient method of ambulation for our subject.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1711-1717
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume85
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Artificial limbs
  • Disarticulations
  • Energy expenditure
  • Knee
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Energy expenditure and gait characteristics of a bilateral amputee walking with C-leg prostheses compared with stubby and conventional articulating prostheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this