TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing an existing clinical information system to improve study recruitment and census gathering efficiency.
AU - Nkoy, Flory L.
AU - Wolfe, Doug
AU - Hales, Joseph W.
AU - Lattin, Gena
AU - Rackham, Maryann
AU - Maloney, Christopher G.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Information technology can improve healthcare efficiency. We developed and implemented a simple and inexpensive tool, the "Automated Case Finding and Alerting System" (ACAS), using data from an existing clinical information system to facilitate identification of potentially eligible patients for clinical trials and patient encounters for billing purposes. We validated the ACAS by calculating the level of agreement in patient identification with data generated from manual identification methods. There was substantial agreement between the two methods both for clinical trial (kappa:0.84) and billing (kappa:0.97). Automated identification occurred instantaneously vs. about 2 hours/day for clinical trial and 1 hour 10 minutes/day for billing, and was inexpensive ($98.95, one time fee) compared to manual identification ($1,200/month for clinical trial and $670/month for billing). Automated identification was more efficient and cost-effective than manual identification methods. Repurposing clinical information beyond their traditional use has the potential to improve efficiency and decrease healthcare cost.
AB - Information technology can improve healthcare efficiency. We developed and implemented a simple and inexpensive tool, the "Automated Case Finding and Alerting System" (ACAS), using data from an existing clinical information system to facilitate identification of potentially eligible patients for clinical trials and patient encounters for billing purposes. We validated the ACAS by calculating the level of agreement in patient identification with data generated from manual identification methods. There was substantial agreement between the two methods both for clinical trial (kappa:0.84) and billing (kappa:0.97). Automated identification occurred instantaneously vs. about 2 hours/day for clinical trial and 1 hour 10 minutes/day for billing, and was inexpensive ($98.95, one time fee) compared to manual identification ($1,200/month for clinical trial and $670/month for billing). Automated identification was more efficient and cost-effective than manual identification methods. Repurposing clinical information beyond their traditional use has the potential to improve efficiency and decrease healthcare cost.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953783050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953783050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 20351902
AN - SCOPUS:79953783050
SN - 1559-4076
VL - 2009
SP - 476
EP - 480
JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
ER -