TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of crop gross primary production (GPP)
T2 - fAPARchl versus MOD15A2 FPAR
AU - Zhang, Qingyuan
AU - Cheng, Yen Ben
AU - Lyapustin, Alexei I.
AU - Wang, Yujie
AU - Gao, Feng
AU - Suyker, Andrew
AU - Verma, Shashi
AU - Middleton, Elizabeth M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by NASA Terrestrial Ecology project (Grant No., NNX12AJ51G ; PI, Q. Zhang) and NASA Science of Terra and Aqua project (Grant No., NNX14AK50G ; PI, Q. Zhang) (Dr. Diane Wickland, manager). We would like to thank the support and the use of facilities and equipment provided by the Center for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies and the Carbon Sequestration program, University of Nebraska—Lincoln. Site-specific climate and CO 2 flux data are distributed by AmeriFlux network ( http://public.ornl.gov/ameriflux ), supported by Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory of the Department of Energy . We are grateful to Drs. Anatoly Gitelson and Yi Peng for helpful discussion and comments and for providing field fAPAR canopy , fAPAR green , LAI and LAI green . USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
PY - 2014/10
Y1 - 2014/10
N2 - Photosynthesis (PSN) is a pigment level process in which antenna pigments (predominately chlorophylls) in chloroplasts absorb photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for the photochemical process. PAR absorbed by foliar non-photosynthetic components is not used for PSN. The fraction of PAR absorbed (fAPAR) by a canopy/vegetation (i.e., fAPARcanopy) derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images, referred to as MOD15A2 FPAR, has been used to compute absorbed PAR (APAR) for PSN (APARPSN) which is utilized to produce the standard MODIS gross primary production (GPP) product, referred to as MOD17A2 GPP. In this study, the fraction of PAR absorbed by chlorophyll throughout the canopy (fAPARchl) was retrieved from MODIS images for three AmeriFlux crop fields in Nebraska. There are few studies in the literature that compare the performance of MOD15A2 FPAR versus fAPARchl in GPP estimation. In our study MOD15A2 FPAR and the retrieved fAPARchl were compared with field fAPARcanopy and the fraction of PAR absorbed by green leaves of the vegetation (fAPARgreen). MOD15A2 FPAR overestimated field fAPARcanopy in spring and in fall, and underestimated field fAPARcanopy in midsummer whereas fAPARchl correctly captured the seasonal phenology. The retrieved fAPARchl agreed well with field fAPARgreen at early crop growth stage in June, and was less than field fAPARgreen in late July, August and September. GPP estimates with fAPARchl and with MOD15A2 FPAR were compared to tower flux GPP. GPP simulated with fAPARchl was corroborated with tower flux GPP. Improvements in crop GPP estimation were achieved by replacing MOD15A2 FPAR with fAPARchl which also reduced uncertainties of crop GPP estimates by 1.12-2.37gCm-2d-1.
AB - Photosynthesis (PSN) is a pigment level process in which antenna pigments (predominately chlorophylls) in chloroplasts absorb photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for the photochemical process. PAR absorbed by foliar non-photosynthetic components is not used for PSN. The fraction of PAR absorbed (fAPAR) by a canopy/vegetation (i.e., fAPARcanopy) derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images, referred to as MOD15A2 FPAR, has been used to compute absorbed PAR (APAR) for PSN (APARPSN) which is utilized to produce the standard MODIS gross primary production (GPP) product, referred to as MOD17A2 GPP. In this study, the fraction of PAR absorbed by chlorophyll throughout the canopy (fAPARchl) was retrieved from MODIS images for three AmeriFlux crop fields in Nebraska. There are few studies in the literature that compare the performance of MOD15A2 FPAR versus fAPARchl in GPP estimation. In our study MOD15A2 FPAR and the retrieved fAPARchl were compared with field fAPARcanopy and the fraction of PAR absorbed by green leaves of the vegetation (fAPARgreen). MOD15A2 FPAR overestimated field fAPARcanopy in spring and in fall, and underestimated field fAPARcanopy in midsummer whereas fAPARchl correctly captured the seasonal phenology. The retrieved fAPARchl agreed well with field fAPARgreen at early crop growth stage in June, and was less than field fAPARgreen in late July, August and September. GPP estimates with fAPARchl and with MOD15A2 FPAR were compared to tower flux GPP. GPP simulated with fAPARchl was corroborated with tower flux GPP. Improvements in crop GPP estimation were achieved by replacing MOD15A2 FPAR with fAPARchl which also reduced uncertainties of crop GPP estimates by 1.12-2.37gCm-2d-1.
KW - GPP
KW - MOD15A2 FPAR
KW - MODIS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906055299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906055299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rse.2014.07.012
DO - 10.1016/j.rse.2014.07.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84906055299
SN - 0034-4257
VL - 153
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Remote Sensing of Environment
JF - Remote Sensing of Environment
ER -