Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization

Ingrid Philibert; Amanda Fletcher; Katrina M. Poppert Cordts; Matthew Rizzo

doi:10.1017/cts.2024.25

Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization

Ingrid Philibert, Amanda Fletcher, Katrina M. Poppert Cordts, Matthew Rizzo

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Institutional Development Awards for Clinical and Translational Research (IDeA-CTR) networks, funded by NIH/NIGMS, aim to advance CTR infrastructure to address historically unmet state and regional health needs. Success depends on the response to actionable feedback to IDeA-CTR leadership from network partners and governance groups through annual surveys, interviews, and governance body recommendations. The Great Plains IDeA-CTR applied internal formative meta-evaluation to evaluate dispositions of 172 governance recommendations from 2017 to 2021. Results provided insights to improve the classification and quality of recommendations, credibility of evaluation processes, responsiveness to recommendations, and communications and governance in a complex CTR network comprising multiple coalitions.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	e42
Journal	Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Volume	8
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.25
State	Published - Feb 13 2024

Keywords

Clinical and translational research
governance
meta-evaluation
quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.1017/cts.2024.25

Cite this

@article{1fe78ed129d54f4599b7ab7b5846efb2,

title = "Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization",

abstract = "Institutional Development Awards for Clinical and Translational Research (IDeA-CTR) networks, funded by NIH/NIGMS, aim to advance CTR infrastructure to address historically unmet state and regional health needs. Success depends on the response to actionable feedback to IDeA-CTR leadership from network partners and governance groups through annual surveys, interviews, and governance body recommendations. The Great Plains IDeA-CTR applied internal formative meta-evaluation to evaluate dispositions of 172 governance recommendations from 2017 to 2021. Results provided insights to improve the classification and quality of recommendations, credibility of evaluation processes, responsiveness to recommendations, and communications and governance in a complex CTR network comprising multiple coalitions.",

keywords = "Clinical and translational research, governance, meta-evaluation, quality improvement",

author = "Ingrid Philibert and Amanda Fletcher and {Poppert Cordts}, {Katrina M.} and Matthew Rizzo",

year = "2024",

month = feb,

day = "13",

doi = "10.1017/cts.2024.25",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "8",

journal = "Journal of Clinical and Translational Science",

issn = "2059-8661",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization

AU - Philibert, Ingrid

AU - Fletcher, Amanda

AU - Poppert Cordts, Katrina M.

AU - Rizzo, Matthew

PY - 2024/2/13

Y1 - 2024/2/13

N2 - Institutional Development Awards for Clinical and Translational Research (IDeA-CTR) networks, funded by NIH/NIGMS, aim to advance CTR infrastructure to address historically unmet state and regional health needs. Success depends on the response to actionable feedback to IDeA-CTR leadership from network partners and governance groups through annual surveys, interviews, and governance body recommendations. The Great Plains IDeA-CTR applied internal formative meta-evaluation to evaluate dispositions of 172 governance recommendations from 2017 to 2021. Results provided insights to improve the classification and quality of recommendations, credibility of evaluation processes, responsiveness to recommendations, and communications and governance in a complex CTR network comprising multiple coalitions.

AB - Institutional Development Awards for Clinical and Translational Research (IDeA-CTR) networks, funded by NIH/NIGMS, aim to advance CTR infrastructure to address historically unmet state and regional health needs. Success depends on the response to actionable feedback to IDeA-CTR leadership from network partners and governance groups through annual surveys, interviews, and governance body recommendations. The Great Plains IDeA-CTR applied internal formative meta-evaluation to evaluate dispositions of 172 governance recommendations from 2017 to 2021. Results provided insights to improve the classification and quality of recommendations, credibility of evaluation processes, responsiveness to recommendations, and communications and governance in a complex CTR network comprising multiple coalitions.

KW - Clinical and translational research

KW - governance

KW - meta-evaluation

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185280022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85185280022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/cts.2024.25

DO - 10.1017/cts.2024.25

M3 - Article

C2 - 38476243

AN - SCOPUS:85185280022

SN - 2059-8661

VL - 8

JO - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

IS - 1

M1 - e42

ER -

Evaluating governance in a clinical and translational research organization

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this