Evaluation of cerebrovascular doppler examination and oculopneumoplethysmography in a clinical perspective

Thomas G. Lynch, Creighton B. Wright, Edwin V. Miller, Earlene E. Slaymaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The cerebrovascular Doppler examination (CDE) and culopneumoplethysmography (OPG-Gee) were compared in a single population group with no statistically significant difference found between the 2 studies. There appeared to be an advantage to combinant testing, for when the results of the 2 studies were concordant there was an accuracy of 94% and a false negative rate of 8%. Clinical correlation was available in 96% of the patients, providing adequate evidence to support the adjuvant role of non-invasive screening in the evaluation of symptomatic individuals. The percentage of false negative studies and the incidence of ulcerative disease make a diagnostic role impractical at present. For the asymptomatic individual, the diagnostic role of non-invasive screening seems justified. The false negative studies in the present series were confined to those vessels with 50–70% stenoses, which are difficult to assess angiographically and may be better characterized by hemodynaraic evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-330
Number of pages6
JournalStroke
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of cerebrovascular doppler examination and oculopneumoplethysmography in a clinical perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this