TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of handle positions using force/endurance relationship of an isometric holding task
AU - Bishu, Ram R.
AU - Myung, Ro Hae
AU - Deeb, Joseph M.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.
AB - Almost all the published studies on container handle positions have used the psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical criteria to evaluate the best handle locations on container. The primary intent of this investigation was to determine if force endurance relationship curves could be used as criterion for comparing the handle positions. Ten subjects participated in a factorial experiment involving four handle positions (2/2, 3/7, 8/8, and 6/8), and four levels of exertion (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximum lifting capacity). On any treatment condition, the subjects held the box till their endurance limit. The endurance time and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were the dependent measures. For the RPE, it was observed that the asymmetric position 6/8 was the best. Similarly the handle position 6/8 had the longest endurance as observed by a third order polynomial fit. The differences among the handle position were consistent across all levels and exertions tested. Further, it appears that the maximum lifting capacity is closer to the grip strength of the non-dominant hand.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025551878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025551878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/154193129003401006
DO - 10.1177/154193129003401006
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:0025551878
SN - 0163-5182
SP - 692
EP - 696
JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society
JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society
T2 - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting - Orlando '90
Y2 - 8 October 1990 through 12 October 1990
ER -