TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of long-term degree-days estimated with several methods for corn in Nebraska, USA
AU - Richmond, Juliana D.
AU - Shulski, Martha D.
AU - Yang, Haishun
AU - Elmore, Roger W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2011–68002-30220 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The publication of this study is supported by University of Nebraska–Lincoln and the Nebraska State Climate Office.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Natalie Umphlett, for setting up an online user’s account to download the climate data; Shellie Hanneman, for explaining the quality control process of the climate data; Timothy J. Arkebauer and Michael J. Hayes, for helping to pick out the study locations; and Zhentao Zhang, for helping to revise the study locations map.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - The concept of thermal time, measured in degree-days, is widely used among the agricultural community in Nebraska to make decisions in corn (Zea mays L.) production. Instead of the real-time temperatures that are experienced by corn plants, most of the widely available temperature data are limited to daily timescale observations from standard meteorological stations. And a variety of equations are used by different agricultural groups (e.g., researchers, advisors, farmers, and seed companies) to estimate thermal time for corn. Two problems could arise: (a) the estimation method is lacking in accuracy; and (b) different estimation methods are used for the same purpose by different groups. Consequently, citing these inaccurate and maybe inherently different thermal time results could lead to biased decisions in corn production. The goal of this study is to evaluate six commonly used estimation methods by comparing the estimated thermal time with the hourly temperature approximated thermal time. We analyzed the root mean square error and mean absolute error for six metrics of total growing season (from May through September) degree-days based on the temperature data from a total of 14 long-term observing locations in Nebraska. In particular, we selected four location-extreme year cases to demonstrate the six methods’ estimation performance on a daily timescale. We found that the most commonly used adjusted Tmax and Tmin rectangle method provided poor estimation in the study area. Instead, single-sine, double-sine, or Tavg-based method was more superior depending on the metric of degree-days.
AB - The concept of thermal time, measured in degree-days, is widely used among the agricultural community in Nebraska to make decisions in corn (Zea mays L.) production. Instead of the real-time temperatures that are experienced by corn plants, most of the widely available temperature data are limited to daily timescale observations from standard meteorological stations. And a variety of equations are used by different agricultural groups (e.g., researchers, advisors, farmers, and seed companies) to estimate thermal time for corn. Two problems could arise: (a) the estimation method is lacking in accuracy; and (b) different estimation methods are used for the same purpose by different groups. Consequently, citing these inaccurate and maybe inherently different thermal time results could lead to biased decisions in corn production. The goal of this study is to evaluate six commonly used estimation methods by comparing the estimated thermal time with the hourly temperature approximated thermal time. We analyzed the root mean square error and mean absolute error for six metrics of total growing season (from May through September) degree-days based on the temperature data from a total of 14 long-term observing locations in Nebraska. In particular, we selected four location-extreme year cases to demonstrate the six methods’ estimation performance on a daily timescale. We found that the most commonly used adjusted Tmax and Tmin rectangle method provided poor estimation in the study area. Instead, single-sine, double-sine, or Tavg-based method was more superior depending on the metric of degree-days.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123239627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123239627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00704-021-03885-6
DO - 10.1007/s00704-021-03885-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123239627
SN - 0177-798X
VL - 147
SP - 1635
EP - 1648
JO - Theoretical and Applied Climatology
JF - Theoretical and Applied Climatology
IS - 3-4
ER -