TY - JOUR
T1 - Evolution of three streambanks before and after stabilization and record flooding
AU - Russell, Matthew
AU - Mittelstet, Aaron R.
AU - Messer, Tiffany L.
AU - Korus, Jesse T.
AU - Joeckel, R. M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge Janet Sanders of the Lower Loup RC&D and Ed Hovet, construction engineer on the Cedar River. Funding for the project was provided through the Nebraska Environmental Trust – Cedar River Corridor Project III and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project 1015698 .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Stabilization projects are increasingly used to mitigate the effects of anthropogenic streambank erosion, yet the effectiveness of stabilization has been insufficiently measured. Sound monitoring practices inform adjustments in implementation and maintenance, which improve engineered effectiveness. Thus, the objectives of this study were to: 1) measure streambank migration from in three reaches stabilized with wooden jetties following a major flooding event, and 2) quantify deposition around the jetties between pre-flood and post-flood. Streambank deposition was measured in 2019 with a River Surveyor and Global Positioning System (GPS). Bank erosion rates in Reaches 1, 2 and 3 were 0.41, 0.96 and 0.07 m2 m−1 yr−1, respectively, from pre-installation of wooden jetties. After streambanks in these reaches were stabilized, Reach 1 experienced 0.11 m2 m−1 yr−1 of erosion while Reaches 2 and 3 had 0.13 and 0.01 m2 m−1 yr−1 of deposition. Deposition increased in 2019 (1.61 and 0.81 m2 m−1) following a high magnitude flood. We utilized a new method for quantifying accumulated sediment in stream beds and banks. Our application of this new method demonstrates that jetties in the Cedar River have decreased streambank migration and increased sediment deposition at the point of implementation. The quantification of stream-sediment dynamics near jetties provides crucial information for stream-restoration design and decision-making, specifically for bioengineering design implementation.
AB - Stabilization projects are increasingly used to mitigate the effects of anthropogenic streambank erosion, yet the effectiveness of stabilization has been insufficiently measured. Sound monitoring practices inform adjustments in implementation and maintenance, which improve engineered effectiveness. Thus, the objectives of this study were to: 1) measure streambank migration from in three reaches stabilized with wooden jetties following a major flooding event, and 2) quantify deposition around the jetties between pre-flood and post-flood. Streambank deposition was measured in 2019 with a River Surveyor and Global Positioning System (GPS). Bank erosion rates in Reaches 1, 2 and 3 were 0.41, 0.96 and 0.07 m2 m−1 yr−1, respectively, from pre-installation of wooden jetties. After streambanks in these reaches were stabilized, Reach 1 experienced 0.11 m2 m−1 yr−1 of erosion while Reaches 2 and 3 had 0.13 and 0.01 m2 m−1 yr−1 of deposition. Deposition increased in 2019 (1.61 and 0.81 m2 m−1) following a high magnitude flood. We utilized a new method for quantifying accumulated sediment in stream beds and banks. Our application of this new method demonstrates that jetties in the Cedar River have decreased streambank migration and increased sediment deposition at the point of implementation. The quantification of stream-sediment dynamics near jetties provides crucial information for stream-restoration design and decision-making, specifically for bioengineering design implementation.
KW - Aquatic ecosystems
KW - Erosion
KW - Geomorphology
KW - Jetty
KW - Sediment deposition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111263917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111263917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106357
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106357
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111263917
SN - 0925-8574
VL - 170
JO - Ecological Engineering
JF - Ecological Engineering
M1 - 106357
ER -