Examining the Nuance in Public Opinion of Pro-LGB Policies in a “Red State”

Mathew Stange, Emily Kazyak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


The red-blue state and urban–rural narratives—which depict that people living in red states and rural areas oppose pro-LGB policies—are popular frames for describing variation in public opinion of LGB policies by geographic region. In a test case of a red state, we examine public opinion of pro-LGB policies to assess the accuracy of the red–blue and urban–rural narratives. Using data from a survey of Nebraskans (n = 1608), we found that public opinion was more nuanced than the red state narrative allows but that urban and rural respondents reported significantly different opinions of pro-LGB policies. Rural people, however, were not unsupportive of all pro-LGB policies. Among all Nebraskans, support was higher for policies to protect LGB people from housing and job discrimination while support was lower for marriage and adoption rights. We discuss what these findings mean for public policy, urban and rural LGB individuals, and future public opinion studies of LGB issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-157
Number of pages16
JournalSexuality Research and Social Policy
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016


  • Bisexual
  • Gay
  • Lesbian
  • Nebraska
  • Public Opinion
  • Red state
  • Rural
  • Urban

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the Nuance in Public Opinion of Pro-LGB Policies in a “Red State”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this