Exploring factors that influence the efficacy of functional communication training

Jessie Weber, Tara Fahmie, Seth Walker, Joseph Lambert, Bailey Copeland, Thomas Freetly, Amanda Zangrillo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Understanding factors that influence the efficacy of functional communication training has both practical and conceptual benefits. The current study extended research in this area by exploring data from 95 consecutive applications of functional communication training with extinction across two independent clinics. We selected candidate predictor variables based on conceptual analysis, conducted preliminary exploratory analyses, and then selectively applied quantitative methods that are used in precision medicine to examine their accuracy and predictive utility. Treatment outcomes were better when challenging behavior was maintained by a single function than they were when it was maintained by multiple functions; however, these differences were most apparent among cases with an escape function. We also analyzed within-session responding to explore the potential influence of unprogrammed establishing operations on decrements in treatment efficacy. Our within-session measure only distinguished responders from nonresponders when escape was one of the multiple functions. Additional research is needed to validate these findings with an independent sample and to address a number of clinical conceptual issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)709-724
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2024

Keywords

  • functional analysis
  • functional communication
  • precision medicine
  • predictor variables

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring factors that influence the efficacy of functional communication training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this