TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors associated with resident satisfaction with their continuity experience
AU - Serwint, Janet R.
AU - Feigelman, Susan
AU - Dumont-Driscoll, Marilyn
AU - Collins, Rebecca
AU - Zhan, Min
AU - Kittredge, Diane
AU - Meltzer, Alan I.
AU - Drutz, Jan
AU - Olsson, John M.
AU - Hillenbrand, Karin
AU - Bogen, Debra
AU - Tanz, Robert R.
AU - Moon, Rachel
AU - Algranti, Paul
AU - Vijjeswarapu, Daniel
AU - Riley, William J.
AU - Pasquinelli, Lawrence
AU - Mazurek, Jill
AU - Dungy, Claibourne I.
AU - Reisen, Sharon
AU - Sectish, Theodore
AU - Schaeffer, Henry A.
AU - Derco, Keith
AU - Blaschke, Gregory
AU - Heitzler, Theresea
AU - Jaffe, Arthur
AU - Volin, Beth
AU - Loprieato, Joseph
AU - Ball, Thomas M.
AU - Campbell, Lisa
AU - Fiegelman, Susan
AU - Walburn, John A.
AU - Dabrow, Sharon
AU - Barrat, Michelle S.
AU - Feguson, Laura E.
AU - Davis, Wendy
AU - May, Ariane
AU - Cantor, Gale
AU - Kelly, Catherine
AU - Forsyth, Brian
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Objective. To identify factors associated with resident satisfaction concerning residents' continuity experience. Design and Methods. Continuity directors distributed questionnaires to residents at their respective institutions. Resident satisfaction was defined as satisfied or very satisfied on a Likert scale. The independent variables included 60 characteristics of the continuity experience from 7 domains: 1) patient attributes, 2) continuity and longitudinal issues, 3) responsibility as primary care provider, 4) preceptor characteristics, 5) educational opportunities, 6) exposure to practice management, and 7) interaction with other clinic and practice staff. A stepwise logistic regression model and the Generalized Estimating Equations approach were used. Results. Thirty-six programs participated. Of 1155 residents (71%) who provided complete data, 67% (n = 775) stated satisfaction with their continuity experience. The following characteristics (adjusted odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were found to be most significant: preceptor as good role model, OR = 7.28 CI = 4.2, 12.5); appropriate amount of teaching, OR = 3.25 (CI - 2.1, 5.1); involvement during hospitalization, OR 2.61 (CI = 1.3, 5.2); exposure to practice management, OR = 2.39 (CI = 1.5, 3.8); good balance of general pediatric patients, OR = 2.34 (CI = 1.5, 3.6); resident as patient advocate, OR 1.74 (CI = 1.2, 2.4); and appropriate amount of nursing support, OR = 1.65 (CI = 1.1, 2.6). Future career choice, type of continuity site, and level of training were not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions. Pediatric resident satisfaction was significantly associated with 7 variables, the most important of which were the ability of the preceptor to serve as a role model and teacher. The type of continuity site was not significant. Residency programs may use these data to develop interventions to enhance resident satisfaction, which may lead to enhanced work performance and patient satisfaction.
AB - Objective. To identify factors associated with resident satisfaction concerning residents' continuity experience. Design and Methods. Continuity directors distributed questionnaires to residents at their respective institutions. Resident satisfaction was defined as satisfied or very satisfied on a Likert scale. The independent variables included 60 characteristics of the continuity experience from 7 domains: 1) patient attributes, 2) continuity and longitudinal issues, 3) responsibility as primary care provider, 4) preceptor characteristics, 5) educational opportunities, 6) exposure to practice management, and 7) interaction with other clinic and practice staff. A stepwise logistic regression model and the Generalized Estimating Equations approach were used. Results. Thirty-six programs participated. Of 1155 residents (71%) who provided complete data, 67% (n = 775) stated satisfaction with their continuity experience. The following characteristics (adjusted odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were found to be most significant: preceptor as good role model, OR = 7.28 CI = 4.2, 12.5); appropriate amount of teaching, OR = 3.25 (CI - 2.1, 5.1); involvement during hospitalization, OR 2.61 (CI = 1.3, 5.2); exposure to practice management, OR = 2.39 (CI = 1.5, 3.8); good balance of general pediatric patients, OR = 2.34 (CI = 1.5, 3.6); resident as patient advocate, OR 1.74 (CI = 1.2, 2.4); and appropriate amount of nursing support, OR = 1.65 (CI = 1.1, 2.6). Future career choice, type of continuity site, and level of training were not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions. Pediatric resident satisfaction was significantly associated with 7 variables, the most important of which were the ability of the preceptor to serve as a role model and teacher. The type of continuity site was not significant. Residency programs may use these data to develop interventions to enhance resident satisfaction, which may lead to enhanced work performance and patient satisfaction.
KW - CORNET research network
KW - Continuity experience
KW - Medical education
KW - Preceptor as role model
KW - Residency Review Committee requirements
KW - Resident satisfaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10744232886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10744232886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1367/1539-4409(2004)004<0004:FAWRSW>2.0.CO;2
DO - 10.1367/1539-4409(2004)004<0004:FAWRSW>2.0.CO;2
M3 - Article
C2 - 14731100
AN - SCOPUS:10744232886
SN - 1530-1567
VL - 4
SP - 4
EP - 10
JO - Ambulatory Pediatrics
JF - Ambulatory Pediatrics
IS - 1
ER -