Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test

Carl V. Smith, Jeffrey P. Phelan, Lawrence D. Platt, Paula Broussard, Richard H. Paul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

117 Scopus citations

Abstract

Antepartum fetal heart rate testing, specifically the nonstress test, is of accepted value in the antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies. Fetal rest-activity cycles coupled with arbitrary test intervals appear to lead to falsely nonreactive tests. Methods to alter fetal behavioral states have not been uniformly successful. A retrospective analysis of the adjunctive use of acoustic stimulation at our institution demonstrated a 50% reduction in the number of nonreactive tests. Consequently a prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the standard nonstress test with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Those patients randomized to the fetal acoustic stimulation test underwent transabdominal acoustic stimulation with a Model 5C electronic artificial larynx. The incidence of nonreactive tests was 14% in the control group and 9% in the study group (K2 = 11.09, p = 0.004). A significant reduction in testing time was also observed. The fetal acoustic stimulation test offers advantages over the traditional nonstress test by lowering the incidence of nonreactive tests and reducing testing time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-134
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume155
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1986

Keywords

  • Antepartum fetal heart rate testing
  • fetal acoustic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this