Abstract
What is the role of expertise in evaluating creative products? Novices and experts do not assess creativity similarly, indicating domain-specific knowledge's role in judging creativity. We describe two studies that examined how "quasi-experts" (people who have more experience in a domain than novices but also lack recognized standing as experts) compared with novices and experts in rating creative work. In Study 1, we compared different types of quasi-experts with novices and experts in rating short stories. In Study 2, we compared experts, quasi-experts, and novices in evaluating an engineering product (a mousetrap design). Quasi-experts (regardless of type) seemed to be appropriate raters for short stories, yet results were mixed for the engineer quasi-experts. Some domains may require more expertise than others to properly evaluate creative work.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 332-340 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2013 |
Keywords
- Assessment
- Creative domains
- Creativity
- Expertise
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- Applied Psychology