Gastric outlet obstruction

Randeep S. Jawa; David W. Mercer

doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6123-4_18

Gastric outlet obstruction

Randeep S. Jawa, David W. Mercer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) indicates obstruction of the distal stomach, pylorus, or proximal duodenum. The term is also used to encompass lesions in the second through fourth portion of the duodenum as the demarcation between gastric outlet obstruction and duodenal obstruction is inconsistent [1]. GOO can be the result of benign or malignant conditions. While classically GOO was ascribed to noncancerous pathology, a frequently cited review by Johnson et al. of 261 patients with GOO indicated that the epidemiology of GOO is changing [2]. They noted that between 1962 and 1975, malignancy accounted for 33 % of GOO cases at their hospital in the United Kingdom. Between 1976 and 1985 malignancy accounted for 50 % of cases. However, from 1987 to 1988 malignancy was responsible for 66 % of cases of GOO. Current thinking is that GOO in adults is secondary to malignancy unless proven otherwise.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery
Publisher	Springer New York
Pages	227-248
Number of pages	22
ISBN (Electronic)	9781461461234
ISBN (Print)	1461461227, 9781461461227
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6123-4_18
State	Published - Jul 1 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-1-4614-6123-4_18

Cite this

@inbook{773236be6a204971a65e32b70e57e430,

title = "Gastric outlet obstruction",

abstract = "Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) indicates obstruction of the distal stomach, pylorus, or proximal duodenum. The term is also used to encompass lesions in the second through fourth portion of the duodenum as the demarcation between gastric outlet obstruction and duodenal obstruction is inconsistent [1]. GOO can be the result of benign or malignant conditions. While classically GOO was ascribed to noncancerous pathology, a frequently cited review by Johnson et al. of 261 patients with GOO indicated that the epidemiology of GOO is changing [2]. They noted that between 1962 and 1975, malignancy accounted for 33 % of GOO cases at their hospital in the United Kingdom. Between 1976 and 1985 malignancy accounted for 50 % of cases. However, from 1987 to 1988 malignancy was responsible for 66 % of cases of GOO. Current thinking is that GOO in adults is secondary to malignancy unless proven otherwise.",

author = "Jawa, {Randeep S.} and Mercer, {David W.}",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-6123-4_18",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "1461461227",

pages = "227--248",

booktitle = "Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery",

publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Gastric outlet obstruction

AU - Jawa, Randeep S.

AU - Mercer, David W.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) indicates obstruction of the distal stomach, pylorus, or proximal duodenum. The term is also used to encompass lesions in the second through fourth portion of the duodenum as the demarcation between gastric outlet obstruction and duodenal obstruction is inconsistent [1]. GOO can be the result of benign or malignant conditions. While classically GOO was ascribed to noncancerous pathology, a frequently cited review by Johnson et al. of 261 patients with GOO indicated that the epidemiology of GOO is changing [2]. They noted that between 1962 and 1975, malignancy accounted for 33 % of GOO cases at their hospital in the United Kingdom. Between 1976 and 1985 malignancy accounted for 50 % of cases. However, from 1987 to 1988 malignancy was responsible for 66 % of cases of GOO. Current thinking is that GOO in adults is secondary to malignancy unless proven otherwise.

AB - Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) indicates obstruction of the distal stomach, pylorus, or proximal duodenum. The term is also used to encompass lesions in the second through fourth portion of the duodenum as the demarcation between gastric outlet obstruction and duodenal obstruction is inconsistent [1]. GOO can be the result of benign or malignant conditions. While classically GOO was ascribed to noncancerous pathology, a frequently cited review by Johnson et al. of 261 patients with GOO indicated that the epidemiology of GOO is changing [2]. They noted that between 1962 and 1975, malignancy accounted for 33 % of GOO cases at their hospital in the United Kingdom. Between 1976 and 1985 malignancy accounted for 50 % of cases. However, from 1987 to 1988 malignancy was responsible for 66 % of cases of GOO. Current thinking is that GOO in adults is secondary to malignancy unless proven otherwise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929528032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929528032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-6123-4_18

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-6123-4_18

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84929528032

SN - 1461461227

SN - 9781461461227

SP - 227

EP - 248

BT - Common Problems in Acute Care Surgery

PB - Springer New York

ER -

Gastric outlet obstruction

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this