Gender-based pay gaps: Methodological and policy issues in University salary studies

Myra Marx Ferree, Julia McQuillan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Methodology is often a point of contention in gender-based salary studies. Although this debate seems at first to be merely about technical issues, it also has an important conceptual dimension. We argue that there are two competing implicit conceptions of discrimination, one institutional and the other individual, that underlie many such debates. We first contrast the preferred methodologies advanced by each side, the policy capturing approach and the flagging approach, and explore the theoretical meaning of their statistical models. We then describe a practical application of both methodological approaches in one specific salary inequity study. In conclusion, we reflect on the implications of such practical statistical choices, discuss how such models can be combined, and make suggestions for sociologists who act as statistical experts or work with them in gender-based salary inequity studies on their own campuses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-39
Number of pages33
JournalGender and Society
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Gender-based pay gaps: Methodological and policy issues in University salary studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this