General vs local anesthesia: Effect on bronchoalveolar lavage findings

F. De Blasio, D. M. Daughton, A. B. Thompson, R. A. Robbins, J. R. Spurzem, J. H. Sisson, S. G. Von Essen, D. J. Romberger, I. Rubinstein, A. A. Floreani, J. Boomsma, A. Pezza, S. I. Rennard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) can be performed with the patient undergoing either local or general anesthesia (GA). This study investigates whether the type of anesthesia affects BAL fluid and cell recovery. Eighty patients, were selected for study. Fluid recoveries were significantly less in the GA group for both the bronchial and alveolar lavages. The differences were confirmed for BAL fluid recovery in a subsequent group of 120 unselected patients. Bronchoscope size did not appear to affect recovery, nor did anesthesia time; BAL fluid recovery from patients with respiratory failure who were intubated and mechanically ventilated was similar to that in the GA group, suggesting that lower recovery rates may be due to mechanical ventilation. The BAL fluid cell counts were related to fluid recovery, but airway neutrophils represented a higher percentage of BAL lavage fluid cells in the GA lavages, independent of differences in the volume of lavage fluid recovered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1032-1037
Number of pages6
JournalChest
Volume104
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'General vs local anesthesia: Effect on bronchoalveolar lavage findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this