Generalizing eyewitness reliability research

Steven Penrod, Brian H. Bornstein

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hugo Munsterberg’s book On the Witness Stand (1908) is often credited as the first effort in English to bring basic research in memory and perception to bear on questions such as whether psychologists might be better equipped than judges or juries to assess the validity of eyewitness identifications. Although Munsterberg gives passing reference to the European work of Binet, Stern, Lipmann, Jung, Wertheimer, Gross, Sommer, and Aschaffenburg, he also acknowledges that the volume is really a set of “popular sketches, which select only a few problems in which psychology and law come in contact. They deal essentially with the mind of the witness on the witness stand” (p. 11). Indeed, judge G. F. Arnold (1906) should probably be credited with an earlier, more thoughtful, scientific, legally informed, and expansive treatment of the implications of psychological research for the courts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology
Subtitle of host publicationVolume II: Memory for People
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages529-556
Number of pages28
Volume2
ISBN (Electronic)9781135608187
ISBN (Print)0805851528, 9780805851526
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Generalizing eyewitness reliability research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Penrod, S., & Bornstein, B. H. (2007). Generalizing eyewitness reliability research. In The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Volume II: Memory for People (Vol. 2, pp. 529-556). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936368-29