Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit

Kimberly Kempf-Leonard, Lisa L. Sample

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Congress intended to make the sentencing process less discretionary and more equitable for similarly situated defendants when it passed the U.S. Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Sentencing guidelines were devised to promote these changes. After more than a decade of implementation, however, little is known about the impact of the new policy. This paper examines sentences given between 1993 and 1994 in one federal circuit in an effort to determine whether this policy instrument has achieved success. The theoretical model of a rational case processing system (Gottfredson and Gottfredson, 1980) is used to guide the interpretation of our findings and the recommendations we offer for improvements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-144
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Disparity
  • Equity
  • Guidelines
  • Sentencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this