TY - JOUR
T1 - Health care costs of peritoneal dialysis technique failure and dialysis modality switching
AU - Chui, Betty K.
AU - Manns, Braden
AU - Pannu, Neesh
AU - Dong, James
AU - Wiebe, Natasha
AU - Jindal, Kailash
AU - Klarenbach, Scott W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Support: Dr Klarenbach was supported by Population Health Investigator awards from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Drs Klarenbach, Manns, Pannu, and Jindal were all supported by a joint initiative between Alberta Health and Wellness and the Universities of Alberta and Calgary.
PY - 2013/1
Y1 - 2013/1
N2 - Background: Although there is a strong economic rationale in favor of peritoneal dialysis (PD) over hemodialysis (HD), the potentially costly effect of PD technique failure is an important consideration in PD program promotion that is unknown. Study Design: Incident dialysis patients were categorized by initial and subsequent modality changes during the first year of dialysis and tracked for inpatient and outpatient costs, physician claims, and medication costs for 3 years using merged administrative data sets. We determined unadjusted and adjusted total cumulative costs for each modality group using multivariable linear regression models. Setting & Participants: All incident dialysis patients from Alberta in 1999-2003. Outcomes: 3-year mean adjusted total cumulative costs. Measurements: Mean direct health care costs by modality group determined using patient-level resource utilization data. Results: 3-year adjusted total cumulative costs for patients in the PD-only and HD-to-PD groups were $58,724 (95% CI, $44,123-$73,325) and $114,503 (95% CI, $96,318-$132,688), respectively, compared with $175,996 (95% CI, $134,787-$217,205) for HD only. PD technique failure was associated with lower costs by $11,466 (95% CI, $248-$22,964) at 1 year compared with HD only; however, costs were similar at 3 years. Costs drivers in PD technique failure arose primarily from costs of dialysis provision, hospitalization, medications, and physician fees. Limitations: This analysis is taken from the perspective of the health payer, and costs that are outside the health care system are not measured. Conclusions: Compared with patients who receive only HD, those who received PD only and those who transitioned from HD to PD therapy had significantly lower total health care costs at 1 and 3 years. Patients experiencing PD technique failure had costs similar and not in excess of HD-only patients at 3 years, further supporting the economic rationale for a PD-first policy in all eligible patients.
AB - Background: Although there is a strong economic rationale in favor of peritoneal dialysis (PD) over hemodialysis (HD), the potentially costly effect of PD technique failure is an important consideration in PD program promotion that is unknown. Study Design: Incident dialysis patients were categorized by initial and subsequent modality changes during the first year of dialysis and tracked for inpatient and outpatient costs, physician claims, and medication costs for 3 years using merged administrative data sets. We determined unadjusted and adjusted total cumulative costs for each modality group using multivariable linear regression models. Setting & Participants: All incident dialysis patients from Alberta in 1999-2003. Outcomes: 3-year mean adjusted total cumulative costs. Measurements: Mean direct health care costs by modality group determined using patient-level resource utilization data. Results: 3-year adjusted total cumulative costs for patients in the PD-only and HD-to-PD groups were $58,724 (95% CI, $44,123-$73,325) and $114,503 (95% CI, $96,318-$132,688), respectively, compared with $175,996 (95% CI, $134,787-$217,205) for HD only. PD technique failure was associated with lower costs by $11,466 (95% CI, $248-$22,964) at 1 year compared with HD only; however, costs were similar at 3 years. Costs drivers in PD technique failure arose primarily from costs of dialysis provision, hospitalization, medications, and physician fees. Limitations: This analysis is taken from the perspective of the health payer, and costs that are outside the health care system are not measured. Conclusions: Compared with patients who receive only HD, those who received PD only and those who transitioned from HD to PD therapy had significantly lower total health care costs at 1 and 3 years. Patients experiencing PD technique failure had costs similar and not in excess of HD-only patients at 3 years, further supporting the economic rationale for a PD-first policy in all eligible patients.
KW - Dialysis modality
KW - economics
KW - health care costs
KW - health policy
KW - peritoneal dialysis
KW - resource utilization
KW - treatment failure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871242646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871242646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.010
DO - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 22901772
AN - SCOPUS:84871242646
SN - 0272-6386
VL - 61
SP - 104
EP - 111
JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
IS - 1
ER -