TY - JOUR
T1 - Heart transplantation with or without prior mechanical circulatory support in adults with congenital heart disease
AU - Maxwell, Bryan G.
AU - Wong, Jim K.
AU - Sheikh, Ahmad Y.
AU - Lee, Peter H.U.
AU - Lobato, Robert L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Stanford University Institutional Review Board granted an exemption from review because this analysis uses deidentified data. Transplantation and post-transplant survival data were obtained using comprehensive datasets from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) through the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). The SRTR data system includes data on all donor, wait-listed candidates and transplant recipients from all transplant centres in the USA, submitted by members of the OPTN under the oversight of the Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Datasets from the OPTN and SRTR were supplied by the Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation pursuant to HSRA contract number HHSH250201000018C. The authors alone were
PY - 2014/5
Y1 - 2014/5
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Recent analyses establish that heart transplantation is increasing among adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), but the effects of pretransplant mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on perioperative and post-transplant outcomes have not been examined in the ACHD population. METHODS: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on all adult heart transplants from September 1987 to September 2012 (n = 47 160) were classified based on primary diagnosis codes as CHD or non-CHD and MCS or non-MCS. Demographic, procedural, outcome and survival variables were compared between MCS and non-MCS ACHD patient groups. RESULTS: MCS was used in 83 (6.8%) ACHD patients compared with 8625 (18.8%) patients without CHD (P < 0.001). MCS as a fraction of ACHD transplants increased over time (P = 0.002). MCS patients spent more time on the wait list, had a higher baseline serum creatinine and were more likely to be male, status 1A, hospitalized, in the ICU and/or on a ventilator prior to transplant. However, MCS patients experienced equivalent short-term survival (30-day mortality = 10.8% in MCS vs 13.5% in non-MCS, P = 0.62) and overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.57). MCS patients had a longer post-transplant length of stay and were more likely to be transfused, but otherwise had no significant differences in adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MCS is less commonly used in adult CHD patients compared with all patients undergoing heart transplant, but has been increasing over time. Within the ACHD population, patients with MCS have a higher risk profile, but except for increased transfusion rate and longer length of stay, do not experience less favourable post-transplant outcomes.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Recent analyses establish that heart transplantation is increasing among adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), but the effects of pretransplant mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on perioperative and post-transplant outcomes have not been examined in the ACHD population. METHODS: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on all adult heart transplants from September 1987 to September 2012 (n = 47 160) were classified based on primary diagnosis codes as CHD or non-CHD and MCS or non-MCS. Demographic, procedural, outcome and survival variables were compared between MCS and non-MCS ACHD patient groups. RESULTS: MCS was used in 83 (6.8%) ACHD patients compared with 8625 (18.8%) patients without CHD (P < 0.001). MCS as a fraction of ACHD transplants increased over time (P = 0.002). MCS patients spent more time on the wait list, had a higher baseline serum creatinine and were more likely to be male, status 1A, hospitalized, in the ICU and/or on a ventilator prior to transplant. However, MCS patients experienced equivalent short-term survival (30-day mortality = 10.8% in MCS vs 13.5% in non-MCS, P = 0.62) and overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.57). MCS patients had a longer post-transplant length of stay and were more likely to be transfused, but otherwise had no significant differences in adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: MCS is less commonly used in adult CHD patients compared with all patients undergoing heart transplant, but has been increasing over time. Within the ACHD population, patients with MCS have a higher risk profile, but except for increased transfusion rate and longer length of stay, do not experience less favourable post-transplant outcomes.
KW - Adult congenital heart disease
KW - Congenital heart disease
KW - Heart transplantation
KW - Mechanical circulatory support
KW - Ventricular assist device
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898648712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898648712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ejcts/ezt498
DO - 10.1093/ejcts/ezt498
M3 - Article
C2 - 24135956
AN - SCOPUS:84898648712
SN - 1010-7940
VL - 45
SP - 842
EP - 846
JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
IS - 5
M1 - ezt498
ER -