TY - JOUR
T1 - How Individuals Use Metaphors to Negotiate Fertility Treatment Decision-Making with Their Romantic Partners
AU - Palmer-Wackerly, Angela L.
AU - Voorhees, Heather L.
AU - Koenig Kellas, Jody
AU - Marsh, Jaclyn S.
AU - Baker, Jonathan T.
AU - Housh, Brooklyn C.
AU - Hall, Robert D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Fertility problems, or the inability to conceive or carry a pregnancy to term for a period of over 12 months while engaging in unprotected sex, affects 12% of women and 9% of men of childbearing age. To answer calls for more research about individuals’ fertility decision-making (DM) with their partners, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 53 individuals who have experienced fertility decision-making with a romantic partner at some point in their lives. Our findings indicate at least three primary ways individuals and their partners navigated their decision-making communication in their infertility “journeys:” (1) the Driver-Navigator, (2) Driver-Passenger, and (3) Driver-Backseat Driver approaches. All decision-making communication approaches were viewed by individuals as collaborative (i.e. shared), but varied in degrees of “togetherness” (high, moderate, low) in how they communicated with each other about treatment decisions. Implications include helping couples and their clinicians to be aware of their DM approach(es) and offering alternative DM approaches based on understanding how and why certain approaches may (not) be effective in addressing goals, needs, and identities.
AB - Fertility problems, or the inability to conceive or carry a pregnancy to term for a period of over 12 months while engaging in unprotected sex, affects 12% of women and 9% of men of childbearing age. To answer calls for more research about individuals’ fertility decision-making (DM) with their partners, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 53 individuals who have experienced fertility decision-making with a romantic partner at some point in their lives. Our findings indicate at least three primary ways individuals and their partners navigated their decision-making communication in their infertility “journeys:” (1) the Driver-Navigator, (2) Driver-Passenger, and (3) Driver-Backseat Driver approaches. All decision-making communication approaches were viewed by individuals as collaborative (i.e. shared), but varied in degrees of “togetherness” (high, moderate, low) in how they communicated with each other about treatment decisions. Implications include helping couples and their clinicians to be aware of their DM approach(es) and offering alternative DM approaches based on understanding how and why certain approaches may (not) be effective in addressing goals, needs, and identities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134053759&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134053759&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10410236.2022.2096984
DO - 10.1080/10410236.2022.2096984
M3 - Article
C2 - 35821598
AN - SCOPUS:85134053759
SN - 1041-0236
VL - 38
SP - 2617
EP - 2627
JO - Health Communication
JF - Health Communication
IS - 12
ER -