TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydraulic conductivity variation within and between layers of a high floodplain profile
AU - Chen, Xunhong
AU - Mi, Haicun
AU - He, Hongman
AU - Liu, Ruichong
AU - Gao, Min
AU - Huo, Aidi
AU - Cheng, Donghui
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 41072183 and 41072184 ). It was also partially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Project Number 2014CB7444702). Two anonymous reviewers provided constructive comments for improving the quality of manuscript. Robert Diffendal, Jr. edited the manuscript.
PY - 2014/7/16
Y1 - 2014/7/16
N2 - We investigated the hydraulic conductivity of a high floodplain of the Weihe River, the largest tributary of the Yellow River in China. We took sediment cores from five layers of the sediments in the high floodplain and performed on-site permeameter tests to determine the horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh) of these undisturbed cores. Although the sediments within each layer were relatively homogeneous, the Kh values exhibited variation among the testing locations within each layer. The Kh values from any two layers were statistically different except for the Kh values from layers 1 and 4, which were statistically from the same population. We used the Jarque-Bera and Lilliefors tests to determine the normality of these Kh values. The Kh values from individual layers (layers 1-3) showed normal distribution. When the Kh values from the three layers were combined as a single data set, both statistical tests failed to confirm the normality; instead, the two test methods suggested log-normal distribution. When the Kh values from the five layers were combined as one data set, they also showed a log-normal distribution. These results suggest that hydraulic conductivity values from an individual layer were likely in normal distribution, although their mean and standard deviation varied for individual layers. We then generated random Kh values of normal distribution based on the mean and standard deviation of the field measurements in the five layers, as well as using modified means and standard deviations. When these normally distributed Kh values were combined into one data set for normality analysis, they became log-normal distribution. Clearly, the probability models of hydraulic conductivity depended on how the layout of the measurement locations was placed on porous media consisting of multiple layers of sediments. Hydraulic conductivity from a single layer cannot be simply assumed to be log-normal. The log-normal-distribution model is not always appropriate for characterization of a hydraulic conductivity field for a relatively homogeneous porous medium.
AB - We investigated the hydraulic conductivity of a high floodplain of the Weihe River, the largest tributary of the Yellow River in China. We took sediment cores from five layers of the sediments in the high floodplain and performed on-site permeameter tests to determine the horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh) of these undisturbed cores. Although the sediments within each layer were relatively homogeneous, the Kh values exhibited variation among the testing locations within each layer. The Kh values from any two layers were statistically different except for the Kh values from layers 1 and 4, which were statistically from the same population. We used the Jarque-Bera and Lilliefors tests to determine the normality of these Kh values. The Kh values from individual layers (layers 1-3) showed normal distribution. When the Kh values from the three layers were combined as a single data set, both statistical tests failed to confirm the normality; instead, the two test methods suggested log-normal distribution. When the Kh values from the five layers were combined as one data set, they also showed a log-normal distribution. These results suggest that hydraulic conductivity values from an individual layer were likely in normal distribution, although their mean and standard deviation varied for individual layers. We then generated random Kh values of normal distribution based on the mean and standard deviation of the field measurements in the five layers, as well as using modified means and standard deviations. When these normally distributed Kh values were combined into one data set for normality analysis, they became log-normal distribution. Clearly, the probability models of hydraulic conductivity depended on how the layout of the measurement locations was placed on porous media consisting of multiple layers of sediments. Hydraulic conductivity from a single layer cannot be simply assumed to be log-normal. The log-normal-distribution model is not always appropriate for characterization of a hydraulic conductivity field for a relatively homogeneous porous medium.
KW - Floodplain
KW - Heterogeneity
KW - Hydraulic conductivity
KW - Probability distribution
KW - The Weihe River
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900538368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900538368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.052
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.052
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84900538368
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 515
SP - 147
EP - 155
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
ER -