TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying glycemic variability in diabetes patient cohorts and evaluating disease outcomes
AU - Nwadiugwu, Martin C.
AU - Bastola, Dhundy R.
AU - Haas, Christian
AU - Russell, Doug
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Glycemic variability (GV) is an obstacle to effective blood glucose control and an au-tonomous risk factor for diabetes complications. We, therefore, explored sample data of patients with diabetes mellitus who maintained better amplitude of glycemic fluctuations and compared their disease outcomes with groups having poor control. A retrospective study was conducted using electronic data of patients having hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) values with five recent time points from Think Whole Person Healthcare (TWPH). The control variability grid analysis (CVGA) plot and coefficient of variability (CV) were used to identify and cluster glycemic fluctuation. We selected important variables using LASSO. Chi-Square, Fisher’s exact test, Bonferroni chi-Square adjusted residual anal-ysis, and multivariate Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to evaluate eventual disease outcomes. Patients with very high CV were strongly associated (p < 0.05) with disorders of lipoprotein (p = 0.0014), fluid, electrolyte, and acid–base balance (p = 0.0032), while those with low CV were statistically significant for factors influencing health status such as screening for other disorders (p = 0.0137), long-term (current) drug therapy (p = 0.0019), and screening for malignant neoplasms (p = 0.0072). Reducing glycemic variability may balance alterations in electrolytes and reduce differences in lipid profiles, which may assist in strategies for managing patients with diabetes mellitus.
AB - Glycemic variability (GV) is an obstacle to effective blood glucose control and an au-tonomous risk factor for diabetes complications. We, therefore, explored sample data of patients with diabetes mellitus who maintained better amplitude of glycemic fluctuations and compared their disease outcomes with groups having poor control. A retrospective study was conducted using electronic data of patients having hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) values with five recent time points from Think Whole Person Healthcare (TWPH). The control variability grid analysis (CVGA) plot and coefficient of variability (CV) were used to identify and cluster glycemic fluctuation. We selected important variables using LASSO. Chi-Square, Fisher’s exact test, Bonferroni chi-Square adjusted residual anal-ysis, and multivariate Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to evaluate eventual disease outcomes. Patients with very high CV were strongly associated (p < 0.05) with disorders of lipoprotein (p = 0.0014), fluid, electrolyte, and acid–base balance (p = 0.0032), while those with low CV were statistically significant for factors influencing health status such as screening for other disorders (p = 0.0137), long-term (current) drug therapy (p = 0.0019), and screening for malignant neoplasms (p = 0.0072). Reducing glycemic variability may balance alterations in electrolytes and reduce differences in lipid profiles, which may assist in strategies for managing patients with diabetes mellitus.
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Diabetes mellitus
KW - Glycemic variability
KW - HbA1c
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114064295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114064295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm10071477
DO - 10.3390/jcm10071477
M3 - Article
C2 - 33918347
AN - SCOPUS:85114064295
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 10
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 7
M1 - 1477
ER -