Immediate and Subsequent Effects of Matched and Unmatched Stimuli on Targeted Vocal Stereotypy and Untargeted Motor Stereotypy

John T. Rapp; Greg Swanson; Stephanie M. Sheridan; Kimberly A. Enloe; Diana Maltese; Lisa A. Sennott; Lauren Shrader; Regina A. Carroll; Sarah M. Richling; Ethan S. Long; Marc J. Lanovaz

doi:10.1177/0145445512461650

Immediate and Subsequent Effects of Matched and Unmatched Stimuli on Targeted Vocal Stereotypy and Untargeted Motor Stereotypy

John T. Rapp, Greg Swanson, Stephanie M. Sheridan, Kimberly A. Enloe, Diana Maltese, Lisa A. Sennott, Lauren Shrader, Regina A. Carroll, Sarah M. Richling, Ethan S. Long, Marc J. Lanovaz

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors evaluated the effects of matched and unmatched stimuli on immediate and subsequent engagement in targeted vocal stereotypy (Experiment 1) and untargeted motor stereotypy (Experiment 2). Results of Experiment 1 showed that (a) matched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for 8 of 11 participants and increased subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of the 8 participants and (b) unmatched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of 10 participants and did not increase subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for this participant. Results of Experiment 2 showed that for 8 of 14 participants, untargeted stereotypy increased when the matched or unmatched stimulus was present, after it was removed, or both. The authors briefly discuss the potential clinical implications of using matched stimulation to decrease vocal stereotypy and limitations of the findings.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	543-567
Number of pages	25
Journal	Behavior Modification
Volume	37
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512461650
State	Published - Jul 2013
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

automatic reinforcement
matched stimuli
multiple schedule
unmatched stimuli
untargeted stereotypy
vocal stereotypy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Developmental and Educational Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1177/0145445512461650

Cite this

Rapp, J. T., Swanson, G., Sheridan, S. M., Enloe, K. A., Maltese, D., Sennott, L. A., Shrader, L., Carroll, R. A., Richling, S. M., Long, E. S., & Lanovaz, M. J. (2013). Immediate and Subsequent Effects of Matched and Unmatched Stimuli on Targeted Vocal Stereotypy and Untargeted Motor Stereotypy. Behavior Modification, 37(4), 543-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512461650

@article{9bbe1b11c4d849349d3f3748366cdcca,

title = "Immediate and Subsequent Effects of Matched and Unmatched Stimuli on Targeted Vocal Stereotypy and Untargeted Motor Stereotypy",

abstract = "The authors evaluated the effects of matched and unmatched stimuli on immediate and subsequent engagement in targeted vocal stereotypy (Experiment 1) and untargeted motor stereotypy (Experiment 2). Results of Experiment 1 showed that (a) matched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for 8 of 11 participants and increased subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of the 8 participants and (b) unmatched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of 10 participants and did not increase subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for this participant. Results of Experiment 2 showed that for 8 of 14 participants, untargeted stereotypy increased when the matched or unmatched stimulus was present, after it was removed, or both. The authors briefly discuss the potential clinical implications of using matched stimulation to decrease vocal stereotypy and limitations of the findings.",

keywords = "automatic reinforcement, matched stimuli, multiple schedule, unmatched stimuli, untargeted stereotypy, vocal stereotypy",

author = "Rapp, {John T.} and Greg Swanson and Sheridan, {Stephanie M.} and Enloe, {Kimberly A.} and Diana Maltese and Sennott, {Lisa A.} and Lauren Shrader and Carroll, {Regina A.} and Richling, {Sarah M.} and Long, {Ethan S.} and Lanovaz, {Marc J.}",

note = "Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by funds provided to John T. Rapp and Ethan S. Long by Autism Speaks Grant 2852. ",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1177/0145445512461650",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "37",

pages = "543--567",

journal = "Behavior Modification",

issn = "0145-4455",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immediate and Subsequent Effects of Matched and Unmatched Stimuli on Targeted Vocal Stereotypy and Untargeted Motor Stereotypy

AU - Rapp, John T.

AU - Swanson, Greg

AU - Sheridan, Stephanie M.

AU - Enloe, Kimberly A.

AU - Maltese, Diana

AU - Sennott, Lisa A.

AU - Shrader, Lauren

AU - Carroll, Regina A.

AU - Richling, Sarah M.

AU - Long, Ethan S.

AU - Lanovaz, Marc J.

N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by funds provided to John T. Rapp and Ethan S. Long by Autism Speaks Grant 2852.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - The authors evaluated the effects of matched and unmatched stimuli on immediate and subsequent engagement in targeted vocal stereotypy (Experiment 1) and untargeted motor stereotypy (Experiment 2). Results of Experiment 1 showed that (a) matched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for 8 of 11 participants and increased subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of the 8 participants and (b) unmatched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of 10 participants and did not increase subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for this participant. Results of Experiment 2 showed that for 8 of 14 participants, untargeted stereotypy increased when the matched or unmatched stimulus was present, after it was removed, or both. The authors briefly discuss the potential clinical implications of using matched stimulation to decrease vocal stereotypy and limitations of the findings.

AB - The authors evaluated the effects of matched and unmatched stimuli on immediate and subsequent engagement in targeted vocal stereotypy (Experiment 1) and untargeted motor stereotypy (Experiment 2). Results of Experiment 1 showed that (a) matched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for 8 of 11 participants and increased subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of the 8 participants and (b) unmatched stimulation decreased immediate engagement in vocal stereotypy for only 1 of 10 participants and did not increase subsequent engagement in vocal stereotypy for this participant. Results of Experiment 2 showed that for 8 of 14 participants, untargeted stereotypy increased when the matched or unmatched stimulus was present, after it was removed, or both. The authors briefly discuss the potential clinical implications of using matched stimulation to decrease vocal stereotypy and limitations of the findings.

KW - automatic reinforcement

KW - matched stimuli

KW - multiple schedule

KW - unmatched stimuli

KW - untargeted stereotypy

KW - vocal stereotypy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878874052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878874052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0145445512461650

DO - 10.1177/0145445512461650

M3 - Article

C2 - 23144173

AN - SCOPUS:84878874052

SN - 0145-4455

VL - 37

SP - 543

EP - 567

JO - Behavior Modification

JF - Behavior Modification

IS - 4

ER -

Immediate and Subsequent Effects of Matched and Unmatched Stimuli on Targeted Vocal Stereotypy and Untargeted Motor Stereotypy

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this