TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of bank stabilization structures on upstream and downstream bank mobilization at cedar river, nebraska
AU - Russell, Matthew V.
AU - Mittelstet, Aaron R.
AU - Joeckel, R. Matthew
AU - Korus, Jesse T.
AU - Castro-Bolinaga, Celso F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded by the Nebraska Environmental Trust (Award No. 110671). The authors would like to thank Janet Sanders of the Loup Basin RC&D Council and Ed Hovet.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The effectiveness of streambank stabilization structures is insufficiently quantified. Although such structures clearly reduce or eliminate streambank erosion at the local scale, little is known about associated effects on unstabilized reaches immediately upstream and downstream. This study measured streambank erosion and deposition in stretches of the Cedar River, 1.5 meander wavelengths upstream and downstream from 24 stabilization structures that included jetties, rock vanes, root wads, and gravel protection. We also measured erosion and deposition on the streambanks directly opposite the stabilized locations. We compared measurements from the pre-stabilization period (1993-2005) with those from the poststabilization period (2005-2018) using historical imagery in ArcGIS. Upon completion of this analysis, we were able to reject an initial hypothesis that local and adjacent streambank segment erosion rates would be significantly less after stabilization, and that deposition rates would be greater in stabilized locations and adjacent stream segments. Instead, the differences in erosion from pre- to post-stabilization showed little or no statistical significance. Rather, our data indicated that streambank erosion decreased in only four of the six stream segments and was predominantly confined to the stabilized segment. Overall deposition decreased in all six stream segments after bank stabilization. In reaches where wooden jetties were installed, partial or total failure was common, and further increases in erosion and decreases in deposition were more pronounced. We conclude that streambank stabilization on the Cedar River is effective only at the location of installation; there is no measurable effect on adjacent unstabilized reaches. Our results demonstrate the need for improved streambank monitoring practices and better understanding of how streambank stabilization impacts an entire river system. Such advances will enhance stream restoration design and implementation, as well as support future river management efforts.
AB - The effectiveness of streambank stabilization structures is insufficiently quantified. Although such structures clearly reduce or eliminate streambank erosion at the local scale, little is known about associated effects on unstabilized reaches immediately upstream and downstream. This study measured streambank erosion and deposition in stretches of the Cedar River, 1.5 meander wavelengths upstream and downstream from 24 stabilization structures that included jetties, rock vanes, root wads, and gravel protection. We also measured erosion and deposition on the streambanks directly opposite the stabilized locations. We compared measurements from the pre-stabilization period (1993-2005) with those from the poststabilization period (2005-2018) using historical imagery in ArcGIS. Upon completion of this analysis, we were able to reject an initial hypothesis that local and adjacent streambank segment erosion rates would be significantly less after stabilization, and that deposition rates would be greater in stabilized locations and adjacent stream segments. Instead, the differences in erosion from pre- to post-stabilization showed little or no statistical significance. Rather, our data indicated that streambank erosion decreased in only four of the six stream segments and was predominantly confined to the stabilized segment. Overall deposition decreased in all six stream segments after bank stabilization. In reaches where wooden jetties were installed, partial or total failure was common, and further increases in erosion and decreases in deposition were more pronounced. We conclude that streambank stabilization on the Cedar River is effective only at the location of installation; there is no measurable effect on adjacent unstabilized reaches. Our results demonstrate the need for improved streambank monitoring practices and better understanding of how streambank stabilization impacts an entire river system. Such advances will enhance stream restoration design and implementation, as well as support future river management efforts.
KW - Adjacent stream reach
KW - Deposition
KW - Erosion
KW - Jetty
KW - Streambank stabilization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117020462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117020462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13031/trans.14551
DO - 10.13031/trans.14551
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117020462
SN - 2151-0032
VL - 64
SP - 1555
EP - 1567
JO - Transactions of the ASABE
JF - Transactions of the ASABE
IS - 5
ER -