TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving female preventive health care delivery through practice change
T2 - An every woman matters study
AU - Backer, Elisabeth L.
AU - Geske, Jenenne A.
AU - McIlvain, Helen E.
AU - Dodendorf, Diane M.
AU - Minier, William C.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Background: The levels of breast and cervical cancer screening in Nebraska primary care remain sub-optimal despite awareness of their importance, and despite implementation of the Every Woman Matters program to assist low-income women. The GAPS model was used to develop a practice-based intervention to identify and reduce barriers to delivery of breast and cervical cancer screening services. Methods: Seven primary care practices actively participated in this multimethod case study. A research nurse collected data and facilitated the intervention process at each site. Qualitative data from field notes, patient encounters, and in-depth interviews of physicians and key informants were collected to describe the process of Papanicolaou and mammogram service delivery, and to identify barriers/facilitators to screening, and potential change areas. Chart reviews provided information regarding the preintervention and postintervention identification/execution of Papanicolaou smears and mammograms. Qualitative and quantitative analyses led to individual practice case studies. Cross case comparisons identified common themes. Results: The individual practice plans for change had many commonalities, ie, developing screening databases and reminder systems. The biggest differences involved practice contexts. Despite use of the GAPS model and a financial incentive to obtain "buy in" from providers and staff, change was difficult for all but 2 of the practices. Conclusion: The complexity of practice context and its effect on change cannot be underestimated. Individual practice providers and staff are often unaware of the potential challenges, and unable/unwilling to overcome them.
AB - Background: The levels of breast and cervical cancer screening in Nebraska primary care remain sub-optimal despite awareness of their importance, and despite implementation of the Every Woman Matters program to assist low-income women. The GAPS model was used to develop a practice-based intervention to identify and reduce barriers to delivery of breast and cervical cancer screening services. Methods: Seven primary care practices actively participated in this multimethod case study. A research nurse collected data and facilitated the intervention process at each site. Qualitative data from field notes, patient encounters, and in-depth interviews of physicians and key informants were collected to describe the process of Papanicolaou and mammogram service delivery, and to identify barriers/facilitators to screening, and potential change areas. Chart reviews provided information regarding the preintervention and postintervention identification/execution of Papanicolaou smears and mammograms. Qualitative and quantitative analyses led to individual practice case studies. Cross case comparisons identified common themes. Results: The individual practice plans for change had many commonalities, ie, developing screening databases and reminder systems. The biggest differences involved practice contexts. Despite use of the GAPS model and a financial incentive to obtain "buy in" from providers and staff, change was difficult for all but 2 of the practices. Conclusion: The complexity of practice context and its effect on change cannot be underestimated. Individual practice providers and staff are often unaware of the potential challenges, and unable/unwilling to overcome them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27944464136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27944464136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.401
DO - 10.3122/jabfm.18.5.401
M3 - Article
C2 - 16148250
AN - SCOPUS:27944464136
SN - 0893-8652
VL - 18
SP - 401
EP - 408
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
IS - 5
ER -