Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial

Samantha M. Harden; Sallie Beth Johnson; Fabio A. Almeida; Paul A. Estabrooks

doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6

Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial

Samantha M. Harden, Sallie Beth Johnson, Fabio A. Almeida, Paul A. Estabrooks

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ² = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; M_age = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; M_age = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants’ increased PA (M_increase = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	28-38
Number of pages	11
Journal	Translational behavioral medicine
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6
State	Published - Mar 1 2017

Keywords

Physical activity
RE-AIM
Research-practice
Translation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Applied Psychology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Harden, S. M., Johnson, S. B., Almeida, F. A., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2017). Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial. Translational behavioral medicine, 7(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6

@article{ea12433c03784b4e8e0b141083b3ed9a,

title = "Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial",

abstract = "Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; Mage = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; Mage = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants{\textquoteright} increased PA (Mincrease = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.",

keywords = "Physical activity, RE-AIM, Research-practice, Translation",

author = "Harden, {Samantha M.} and Johnson, {Sallie Beth} and Almeida, {Fabio A.} and Estabrooks, {Paul A.}",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "7",

pages = "28--38",

journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",

issn = "1869-6716",

publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships

T2 - an effectiveness-implementation trial

AU - Harden, Samantha M.

AU - Johnson, Sallie Beth

AU - Almeida, Fabio A.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; Mage = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; Mage = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants’ increased PA (Mincrease = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.

AB - Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; Mage = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; Mage = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants’ increased PA (Mincrease = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.

KW - Physical activity

KW - RE-AIM

KW - Research-practice

KW - Translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015753293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015753293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6

DO - 10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 28299746

AN - SCOPUS:85015753293

VL - 7

SP - 28

EP - 38

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 1

ER -