TY - JOUR
T1 - Incorporating the dilution effect in group testing regression
AU - Mokalled, Stefani C.
AU - McMahan, Christopher S.
AU - Tebbs, Joshua M.
AU - Andrew Brown, Derek
AU - Bilder, Christopher R.
N1 - Funding Information:
National Institutes of Health, R01 AI21351; National Science Foundation, OIA‐1826715; Office of Naval Research Global, N00014‐19‐1‐2295 Funding information
Funding Information:
information National Institutes of Health, R01 AI21351; National Science Foundation, OIA-1826715; Office of Naval Research Global, N00014-19-1-2295We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer who provided insightful comments on an earlier version of this article. This work was funded by Grant R01 AI121351 from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. McMahan also acknowledges the support of Grant OIA-1826715 from the National Science Foundation and Grant N00014-19-1-2295 from the Office of Naval Research.
Funding Information:
We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer who provided insightful comments on an earlier version of this article. This work was funded by Grant R01 AI121351 from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. McMahan also acknowledges the support of Grant OIA‐1826715 from the National Science Foundation and Grant N00014‐19‐1‐2295 from the Office of Naval Research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2021/5/20
Y1 - 2021/5/20
N2 - When screening for infectious diseases, group testing has proven to be a cost efficient alternative to individual level testing. Cost savings are realized by testing pools of individual specimens (eg, blood, urine, saliva, and so on) rather than by testing the specimens separately. However, a common concern that arises in group testing is the so-called “dilution effect.” This occurs if the signal from a positive individual's specimen is diluted past an assay's threshold of detection when it is pooled with multiple negative specimens. In this article, we propose a new statistical framework for group testing data that merges estimation and case identification, which are often treated separately in the literature. Our approach considers analyzing continuous biomarker levels (eg, antibody levels, antigen concentrations, and so on) from pooled samples to estimate both a binary regression model for the probability of disease and the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. To increase case identification accuracy, we then show how estimates of the biomarker distributions can be used to select diagnostic thresholds on a pool-by-pool basis. Our proposals are evaluated through numerical studies and are illustrated using hepatitis B virus data collected on a prison population in Ireland.
AB - When screening for infectious diseases, group testing has proven to be a cost efficient alternative to individual level testing. Cost savings are realized by testing pools of individual specimens (eg, blood, urine, saliva, and so on) rather than by testing the specimens separately. However, a common concern that arises in group testing is the so-called “dilution effect.” This occurs if the signal from a positive individual's specimen is diluted past an assay's threshold of detection when it is pooled with multiple negative specimens. In this article, we propose a new statistical framework for group testing data that merges estimation and case identification, which are often treated separately in the literature. Our approach considers analyzing continuous biomarker levels (eg, antibody levels, antigen concentrations, and so on) from pooled samples to estimate both a binary regression model for the probability of disease and the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. To increase case identification accuracy, we then show how estimates of the biomarker distributions can be used to select diagnostic thresholds on a pool-by-pool basis. Our proposals are evaluated through numerical studies and are illustrated using hepatitis B virus data collected on a prison population in Ireland.
KW - biomarker
KW - expectation-maximization algorithm
KW - latent data
KW - mixture model
KW - pooled testing
KW - specimen pooling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100910050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100910050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/sim.8916
DO - 10.1002/sim.8916
M3 - Article
C2 - 33598950
AN - SCOPUS:85100910050
SN - 0277-6715
VL - 40
SP - 2540
EP - 2555
JO - Statistics in Medicine
JF - Statistics in Medicine
IS - 11
ER -