Incorporating the dilution effect in group testing regression

Stefani C. Mokalled, Christopher S. McMahan, Joshua M. Tebbs, Derek Andrew Brown, Christopher R. Bilder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When screening for infectious diseases, group testing has proven to be a cost efficient alternative to individual level testing. Cost savings are realized by testing pools of individual specimens (eg, blood, urine, saliva, and so on) rather than by testing the specimens separately. However, a common concern that arises in group testing is the so-called “dilution effect.” This occurs if the signal from a positive individual's specimen is diluted past an assay's threshold of detection when it is pooled with multiple negative specimens. In this article, we propose a new statistical framework for group testing data that merges estimation and case identification, which are often treated separately in the literature. Our approach considers analyzing continuous biomarker levels (eg, antibody levels, antigen concentrations, and so on) from pooled samples to estimate both a binary regression model for the probability of disease and the biomarker distributions for cases and controls. To increase case identification accuracy, we then show how estimates of the biomarker distributions can be used to select diagnostic thresholds on a pool-by-pool basis. Our proposals are evaluated through numerical studies and are illustrated using hepatitis B virus data collected on a prison population in Ireland.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2540-2555
Number of pages16
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - May 20 2021

Keywords

  • biomarker
  • expectation-maximization algorithm
  • latent data
  • mixture model
  • pooled testing
  • specimen pooling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Incorporating the dilution effect in group testing regression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this