TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of neoadjuvant therapy on outcomes in patients with resectable carcinoma of esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction from a tertiary cancer care center in India
AU - Rao T., Subramanyeshwar
AU - Raju, Kalidindi Venkata Vijaya Narsimha
AU - Patnaik, Sujit Chyau
AU - Reddy, Pratap
AU - Saksena, Ajesh Raj
AU - Rajappa, Senthil
AU - Mallavarapu, Krishna Mohan
AU - Santa, Ayyagari
AU - Gudipudi, Deleep
AU - Boleneni, Naren
AU - Usofi, Zeeba
AU - Gujjuru, Swathi
AU - Smith, Lynette
AU - Are, Chandrakanth
AU - Nusrath, Syed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery to upfront surgery (surgery alone) in patients with resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (esophageal cancer [EC]), and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) in a limited resource setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients (from January 2010 through December 2016) who underwent surgery for EC and GEJ cancers. Results: A total of 454 patients were included and categorized into the following groups: nCT (n = 65), nCRT (n = 152) and upfront surgery (n = 237). Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma accounted for two-thirds and one-third of the cases, respectively. nCRT group patients were also noted to have smaller tumors, lower margin positivity and a higher R0 resection rates. With a median follow up of 76 months (35–118 months) improved 5-year overall survival was noted in nCRT group in comparison to nCT and upfront surgery groups (56.5% vs. 34% and 35%, respectively, p =.021). Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrate the beneficial effect of nCRT for patients with EC and GEJ in a limited resource setting. Further studies are required to analyze and promote the benefits of nCRT in limited-resource settings.
AB - Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery to upfront surgery (surgery alone) in patients with resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (esophageal cancer [EC]), and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) in a limited resource setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients (from January 2010 through December 2016) who underwent surgery for EC and GEJ cancers. Results: A total of 454 patients were included and categorized into the following groups: nCT (n = 65), nCRT (n = 152) and upfront surgery (n = 237). Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma accounted for two-thirds and one-third of the cases, respectively. nCRT group patients were also noted to have smaller tumors, lower margin positivity and a higher R0 resection rates. With a median follow up of 76 months (35–118 months) improved 5-year overall survival was noted in nCRT group in comparison to nCT and upfront surgery groups (56.5% vs. 34% and 35%, respectively, p =.021). Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrate the beneficial effect of nCRT for patients with EC and GEJ in a limited resource setting. Further studies are required to analyze and promote the benefits of nCRT in limited-resource settings.
KW - esophageal cancer
KW - neoadjuvant chemoradiation
KW - neoadjuvant therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101875660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101875660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.26444
DO - 10.1002/jso.26444
M3 - Article
C2 - 33650697
AN - SCOPUS:85101875660
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 123
SP - 1547
EP - 1557
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 7
ER -