TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Pentoxifylline on Steady‐State Theophylline Serum Concentrations from Sustained‐Release Formulations
AU - Ellison, Mark J.
AU - Horner, Ronnie D.
AU - Willis, Stephen E.
AU - Cummings, Doyle M.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - This clinical study assessed the influence of pentoxifylline and its metabolites on steady‐state serum theophylline concentrations. Nine healthy volunteers took sustained‐release formulations of pentoxifylline, theophylline, and a combination of both agents each for 7 days at standard therapeutic doses in a randomized order. Serum theophylline concentrations were analyzed using fluorescence‐polarization immunoassay (TDx) technique. During the pentoxifylline treatment phase, serum theophylline concentrations were undetectable, demonstrating the lack of assay interference from pentoxifylline and its metabolites. Mean trough steady‐state serum theophylline concentrations were 30% higher (p < 0.05) during the combination treatment phase compared to theophylline administration alone, and varied considerably. Although side effects were more frequent during the combination phase, differences in the number of adverse reactions did not achieve statistical significance. This study demonstrates an interaction between theophylline and pentoxifylline, and indicates that close monitoring of serum theophylline concentrations during combination therapy is warranted. 1990 Pharmacotherapy Publications Inc.
AB - This clinical study assessed the influence of pentoxifylline and its metabolites on steady‐state serum theophylline concentrations. Nine healthy volunteers took sustained‐release formulations of pentoxifylline, theophylline, and a combination of both agents each for 7 days at standard therapeutic doses in a randomized order. Serum theophylline concentrations were analyzed using fluorescence‐polarization immunoassay (TDx) technique. During the pentoxifylline treatment phase, serum theophylline concentrations were undetectable, demonstrating the lack of assay interference from pentoxifylline and its metabolites. Mean trough steady‐state serum theophylline concentrations were 30% higher (p < 0.05) during the combination treatment phase compared to theophylline administration alone, and varied considerably. Although side effects were more frequent during the combination phase, differences in the number of adverse reactions did not achieve statistical significance. This study demonstrates an interaction between theophylline and pentoxifylline, and indicates that close monitoring of serum theophylline concentrations during combination therapy is warranted. 1990 Pharmacotherapy Publications Inc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025601792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025601792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1990.tb03567.x
DO - 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1990.tb03567.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 2287557
AN - SCOPUS:0025601792
SN - 0277-0008
VL - 10
SP - 383
EP - 386
JO - Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
JF - Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
IS - 6
ER -