Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search

Michael D. Dodd, Alan D. Castel, Jay Pratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Horowitz and Wolfe (2001) suggested that inhibition of return (IOR) should not be observed in tasks that involve rapid deployments of attention. To examine this issue, five of six possible locations were sequentially cued with either short-duration peripheral cues (50 msec) or long-duration peripheral cues (500 msec). As was expected, IOR was observed in the first two experiments at every cued location with the long-duration cues, with the magnitude of IOR decreasing for earlier cued locations relative to later cued locations. In the short-cue condition, IOR was observed at only one cued location (the second to last). The pattern of results for the short-duration cues was found regardless of whether the fixation cue was of a short (Experiment 1) or a long (Experiment 2) duration. In Experiment 3, the final fixation cue was removed, and IOR was again observed at virtually all locations in both the short- and the long-cue conditions. These findings indicate that IOR can be observed at multiple locations when attention is shifted rapidly between locations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1126-1135
Number of pages10
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume65
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this