TY - JOUR
T1 - MANTA Versus Suture-based Closure Devices Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
T2 - An Updated Meta-analysis
AU - Al-Abdouh, Ahmad
AU - Abusnina, Waiel
AU - Mhanna, Mohammed
AU - Barbarawi, Mahmoud
AU - Jabri, Ahmad
AU - Bizanti, Anas
AU - Abdel-Latif, Ahmed
AU - Goldsweig, Andrew M.
AU - Alkhouli, Mohamad
AU - Lichaa, Hady
AU - Kerrigan, Jimmy
AU - Paul, Timir K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Background: Vascular access closure is essential in large-bore arteriotomy procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Suture-based devices are frequently used for vascular access closure. MANTA (Teleflex) is a collagen plug–based device used to achieve hemostasis with evolving efficacy and safety data. This study aimed to evaluate plug-based versus suture-based closure devices following large-bore arteriotomy procedures. Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through November 2021) for studies evaluating plug-based versus suture-based closure devices following large-bore arteriotomy procedures. We performed a meta-analysis comparing the length of stay, device failure, mortality, bleeding, and vascular complications between these 2 types of devices. Results: Eleven studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 9 observational studies) with a total of 3123 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with suture-based devices, plug-based devices were associated with a significant decrease in the length of stay (standardized mean difference: −0.14; 95% CI, −0.25 to −0.03) and vascular closure device failure (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.91) following the procedure. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, major or minor bleeding, and major or minor vascular complications between plug-based and suture-based closure devices. Conclusions: Plug-based vascular closure devices were associated with a shorter length of stay and lower risk of device failure following large-bore arteriotomy procedures without differences in mortality, bleeding, or vascular complications than suture-based closure devices.
AB - Background: Vascular access closure is essential in large-bore arteriotomy procedures, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Suture-based devices are frequently used for vascular access closure. MANTA (Teleflex) is a collagen plug–based device used to achieve hemostasis with evolving efficacy and safety data. This study aimed to evaluate plug-based versus suture-based closure devices following large-bore arteriotomy procedures. Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through November 2021) for studies evaluating plug-based versus suture-based closure devices following large-bore arteriotomy procedures. We performed a meta-analysis comparing the length of stay, device failure, mortality, bleeding, and vascular complications between these 2 types of devices. Results: Eleven studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 9 observational studies) with a total of 3123 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with suture-based devices, plug-based devices were associated with a significant decrease in the length of stay (standardized mean difference: −0.14; 95% CI, −0.25 to −0.03) and vascular closure device failure (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.91) following the procedure. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, major or minor bleeding, and major or minor vascular complications between plug-based and suture-based closure devices. Conclusions: Plug-based vascular closure devices were associated with a shorter length of stay and lower risk of device failure following large-bore arteriotomy procedures without differences in mortality, bleeding, or vascular complications than suture-based closure devices.
KW - MANTA
KW - arteriotomy
KW - plug-based
KW - suture-based
KW - vascular closure device
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146609555&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146609555&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100397
DO - 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100397
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39131480
AN - SCOPUS:85146609555
SN - 2772-9303
VL - 1
JO - Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
JF - Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
IS - 5
M1 - 100397
ER -