TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring the cost and value of quality improvement initiatives for local health departments
AU - Chen, Li-Wu
AU - Wilson, Fernando
AU - Gregg, Abbey
AU - Gupta, Niodita
AU - Bekmuratova, Sarbinaz
AU - Palm, David W
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Objective: To demonstrate an approach to measuring the cost and value of quality improvement (QI) implementation in local health departments (LHDs). Design: We conducted cost estimation for 4 LHD QI projects and return-on-investment (ROI) analysis for 2 selected LHD QI projects. Setting and Participants: Four Nebraska LHDs varying in rurality and jurisdiction size. Main outcome measures: Total costs, unit costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and ROI. Results: The 4 QI projects vary significantly in their cost estimates. Estimated ROI ratios for 2 QI projects predicted significant savings in health care utilization for respective program participants. A QI project focused on improving breastfeeding rates in WIC (women, infants, and children) clients had a predicted ROI ratio of 3230% and a QI project for improving participation in a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program would need only 34 new participants to have a positive ROI. Conclusions: We demonstrated how data can be collected and analyzed for cost estimation and ROI analysis to quantify the economic value of QI for LHDs. Our ROI analysis shows that QI initiatives have great potential to enhance the value of LHDs’ public health services. A better understanding of the costs and value of QI will enable LHDs to appropriately allocate and utilize their limited resources for suitable QI initiatives.
AB - Objective: To demonstrate an approach to measuring the cost and value of quality improvement (QI) implementation in local health departments (LHDs). Design: We conducted cost estimation for 4 LHD QI projects and return-on-investment (ROI) analysis for 2 selected LHD QI projects. Setting and Participants: Four Nebraska LHDs varying in rurality and jurisdiction size. Main outcome measures: Total costs, unit costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and ROI. Results: The 4 QI projects vary significantly in their cost estimates. Estimated ROI ratios for 2 QI projects predicted significant savings in health care utilization for respective program participants. A QI project focused on improving breastfeeding rates in WIC (women, infants, and children) clients had a predicted ROI ratio of 3230% and a QI project for improving participation in a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program would need only 34 new participants to have a positive ROI. Conclusions: We demonstrated how data can be collected and analyzed for cost estimation and ROI analysis to quantify the economic value of QI for LHDs. Our ROI analysis shows that QI initiatives have great potential to enhance the value of LHDs’ public health services. A better understanding of the costs and value of QI will enable LHDs to appropriately allocate and utilize their limited resources for suitable QI initiatives.
KW - Cost estimation
KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis
KW - Local health departments
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Return-on-investment analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014205788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014205788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000552
DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000552
M3 - Article
C2 - 28257401
AN - SCOPUS:85014205788
SN - 1078-4659
VL - 24
SP - 164
EP - 171
JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
IS - 2
ER -