TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and diastolic dysfunction
AU - Plitt, Gilman D.
AU - Spring, Jordan T.
AU - Moulton, Michael J.
AU - Agrawal, Devendra K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH grants R01HL112597, R01HL116042, and R01HL120659 to DK Agrawal from the NHLBI. The content of this review is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018/8/3
Y1 - 2018/8/3
N2 - Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) continues to be a major challenge for clinicians. Many crucial aspects of the syndrome remain unclear, including the exact pathophysiology, early diagnosis, and treatment. Patients with HFpEF are often asymptomatic late into the disease process, and treatment with medications commonly used in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has not been proven to be beneficial. In addition, the confusion of similar terms with HFpEF, such as diastolic heart failure, and diastolic dysfunction (DD), has led to a misunderstanding of the true scope of HFpEF. Areas covered: In this review, authors highlight the differences in terminology and critically review the current knowledge on the underlying mechanisms, diagnosis, and latest treatment strategies of HFpEF. Expert commentary: While significant advances have been made in the understanding of HFpEF, the definitive diagnosis of HFpEF continues to be difficult. The development of improved and standardized methods for detecting DD has shown promise in identifying early HFpEF. However, even with early detection, there are few treatment options shown to provide mortality benefit warranting further investigation.
AB - Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) continues to be a major challenge for clinicians. Many crucial aspects of the syndrome remain unclear, including the exact pathophysiology, early diagnosis, and treatment. Patients with HFpEF are often asymptomatic late into the disease process, and treatment with medications commonly used in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has not been proven to be beneficial. In addition, the confusion of similar terms with HFpEF, such as diastolic heart failure, and diastolic dysfunction (DD), has led to a misunderstanding of the true scope of HFpEF. Areas covered: In this review, authors highlight the differences in terminology and critically review the current knowledge on the underlying mechanisms, diagnosis, and latest treatment strategies of HFpEF. Expert commentary: While significant advances have been made in the understanding of HFpEF, the definitive diagnosis of HFpEF continues to be difficult. The development of improved and standardized methods for detecting DD has shown promise in identifying early HFpEF. However, even with early detection, there are few treatment options shown to provide mortality benefit warranting further investigation.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Diastolic dysfunction
KW - HFpEF
KW - HFrEF
KW - Inflammation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050396036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050396036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14779072.2018.1497485
DO - 10.1080/14779072.2018.1497485
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29976104
AN - SCOPUS:85050396036
SN - 1477-9072
VL - 16
SP - 579
EP - 589
JO - Expert review of cardiovascular therapy
JF - Expert review of cardiovascular therapy
IS - 8
ER -