Abstract
Reducing negative impacts of stress, for example through mindfulness training, benefits physical and psychological well-being and is becoming ever more crucial owing to large-scale societal uncertainties (e.g., COVID-19). Whereas extensive research has focused on mindfulness-related reductions in selfreported negativity, essentially no research has targeted task-based behavioral outcomes throughout long-term mindfulness trainings. Responses to emotionally ambiguous signals (e.g., surprised expressions), which might be appraised as either positive or negative, provide a nuanced assessment of one’s emotional bias across diverse contexts, offering unique leverage for assessing the effects of mindfulness. Here, we compared the effects of short and long-term training via Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on ratings of faces with a relatively clear (angry, happy) and ambiguous (surprised) valence. Ratings became more positive for ambiguity from the start (Week 1) to end of training (Week 8; p <.001), but there were no short-term effects (from a single class session). This shift toward positivity continued through an additional 8-week follow-up (Week 16; p <.001). Notably, posttraining valence bias (Week 8) was uniquely predicted by the nonreactivity facet of mindfulness (p =.01). Together, mindfulness promotes a relatively long-lasting shift toward positivity bias, which is uniquely supported by reduced emotional reactivity.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2160-2172 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: General |
Volume | 151 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Emotional ambiguity
- Mindfulness
- Nonreactivity
- Stress
- Valence bias
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Psychology(all)
- Developmental Neuroscience