Modeling the relation between the intensity just-noticeable difference and loudness for pure tones and wideband noise

Jont B. Allen, Stephen T. Neely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

A classical problem in auditory theory is the relation between the loudness L(I) and the intensity just-noticeable difference (JND) ΔI(I). The intensity JND is frequently expressed in terms of the Weber fraction defined by J(I) ≡ ΔI/I because it is anticipated that this ratio should be a constant (i.e., Weber's law). Unfortunately, J(I) is not a constant for the most elementary case of the pure tone JND. Furthermore it remains unexplained why Weber's law holds for wide-band stimuli. We explore this problem and related issues. The loudness and the intensity JND are defined in terms of the first and second moments of a proposed random decision variable called the single-trial loudness L̄(I), namely the loudness is L(I) ≡ εL̄(I), while the variance of the single trial loudness is σ(L)/2 ≡ ε(L̄-L)2. The JND is given by the signal detection assumption ΔL=d'σ(L), where we define the loudness JND ΔL(I) as the change in loudness corresponding to Δ/(I). Inspired by Hellman and Hellman's recent theory [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 1255-1271 (1990)], we compare the Riesz [Phys. Rev. 31, 867-875 (1928)] ΔI(I) data to the Fletcher and Munson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 82-108 (1933)] loudness growth data. We then make the same comparison for Miller's [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 609-619 (1947)] wideband noise JND and loudness match data. Based on this comparison, we show empirically that ΔL(L)∞L(1/p), where p=2 below ≃5 sones and is 1 above. Since ΔL(I) is proportional to σ(L), when p=2 the statistics of the single-trial loudness L̄ are Poisson- like, namely σ(L)/2∞L. This is consistent with the idea that the pure tone loudness code is based a neural discharge rate (not the auditory nerve). Furthermore, when p = 1 (above about 5 sones), the internal loudness signal- to-noise ratio is constant. It is concluded that Ekman's law (ΔL/L is constant) is true, rather than Weber's law, in this loudness range. One of the main contributions of this paper is its attempt to integrate Fletcher's neural excitation pattern model of loudness and signal detection theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3628-3646
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume102
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling the relation between the intensity just-noticeable difference and loudness for pure tones and wideband noise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this