TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the relation between the intensity just-noticeable difference and loudness for pure tones and wideband noise
AU - Allen, Jont B.
AU - Neely, Stephen T.
PY - 1997/12
Y1 - 1997/12
N2 - A classical problem in auditory theory is the relation between the loudness L(I) and the intensity just-noticeable difference (JND) ΔI(I). The intensity JND is frequently expressed in terms of the Weber fraction defined by J(I) ≡ ΔI/I because it is anticipated that this ratio should be a constant (i.e., Weber's law). Unfortunately, J(I) is not a constant for the most elementary case of the pure tone JND. Furthermore it remains unexplained why Weber's law holds for wide-band stimuli. We explore this problem and related issues. The loudness and the intensity JND are defined in terms of the first and second moments of a proposed random decision variable called the single-trial loudness L̄(I), namely the loudness is L(I) ≡ εL̄(I), while the variance of the single trial loudness is σ(L)/2 ≡ ε(L̄-L)2. The JND is given by the signal detection assumption ΔL=d'σ(L), where we define the loudness JND ΔL(I) as the change in loudness corresponding to Δ/(I). Inspired by Hellman and Hellman's recent theory [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 1255-1271 (1990)], we compare the Riesz [Phys. Rev. 31, 867-875 (1928)] ΔI(I) data to the Fletcher and Munson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 82-108 (1933)] loudness growth data. We then make the same comparison for Miller's [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 609-619 (1947)] wideband noise JND and loudness match data. Based on this comparison, we show empirically that ΔL(L)∞L(1/p), where p=2 below ≃5 sones and is 1 above. Since ΔL(I) is proportional to σ(L), when p=2 the statistics of the single-trial loudness L̄ are Poisson- like, namely σ(L)/2∞L. This is consistent with the idea that the pure tone loudness code is based a neural discharge rate (not the auditory nerve). Furthermore, when p = 1 (above about 5 sones), the internal loudness signal- to-noise ratio is constant. It is concluded that Ekman's law (ΔL/L is constant) is true, rather than Weber's law, in this loudness range. One of the main contributions of this paper is its attempt to integrate Fletcher's neural excitation pattern model of loudness and signal detection theory.
AB - A classical problem in auditory theory is the relation between the loudness L(I) and the intensity just-noticeable difference (JND) ΔI(I). The intensity JND is frequently expressed in terms of the Weber fraction defined by J(I) ≡ ΔI/I because it is anticipated that this ratio should be a constant (i.e., Weber's law). Unfortunately, J(I) is not a constant for the most elementary case of the pure tone JND. Furthermore it remains unexplained why Weber's law holds for wide-band stimuli. We explore this problem and related issues. The loudness and the intensity JND are defined in terms of the first and second moments of a proposed random decision variable called the single-trial loudness L̄(I), namely the loudness is L(I) ≡ εL̄(I), while the variance of the single trial loudness is σ(L)/2 ≡ ε(L̄-L)2. The JND is given by the signal detection assumption ΔL=d'σ(L), where we define the loudness JND ΔL(I) as the change in loudness corresponding to Δ/(I). Inspired by Hellman and Hellman's recent theory [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 1255-1271 (1990)], we compare the Riesz [Phys. Rev. 31, 867-875 (1928)] ΔI(I) data to the Fletcher and Munson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 82-108 (1933)] loudness growth data. We then make the same comparison for Miller's [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 609-619 (1947)] wideband noise JND and loudness match data. Based on this comparison, we show empirically that ΔL(L)∞L(1/p), where p=2 below ≃5 sones and is 1 above. Since ΔL(I) is proportional to σ(L), when p=2 the statistics of the single-trial loudness L̄ are Poisson- like, namely σ(L)/2∞L. This is consistent with the idea that the pure tone loudness code is based a neural discharge rate (not the auditory nerve). Furthermore, when p = 1 (above about 5 sones), the internal loudness signal- to-noise ratio is constant. It is concluded that Ekman's law (ΔL/L is constant) is true, rather than Weber's law, in this loudness range. One of the main contributions of this paper is its attempt to integrate Fletcher's neural excitation pattern model of loudness and signal detection theory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031458689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031458689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.420150
DO - 10.1121/1.420150
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031458689
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 102
SP - 3628
EP - 3646
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 6
ER -