TY - JOUR
T1 - Modular and state-relevant functional network connectivity in high-frequency eyes open vs eyes closed resting fMRI data
AU - DeRamus, Thomas
AU - Faghiri, Ashkan
AU - Iraji, Armin
AU - Agcaoglu, Oktay
AU - Vergara, Victor
AU - Fu, Zening
AU - Silva, Rogers
AU - Gazula, Harshvardhan
AU - Stephen, Julia
AU - Wilson, Tony W.
AU - Wang, Yu Ping
AU - Calhoun, Vince
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Background: Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) is employed to assess “functional connections” of signal between brain regions. However, multiple rs-fMRI paradigms and data-filtering strategies have been used, highlighting the need to explore BOLD signal across the spectrum. Rs-fMRI data is typically filtered at frequencies ranging between 0.008∼0.2 Hz to mitigate nuisance signal (e.g. cardiac, respiratory) and maximize neuronal BOLD signal. However, some argue neuronal BOLD signal may be parsed at higher frequencies. New method: To assess the contributions of rs-fMRI along the BOLD spectra on functional network connectivity (FNC) matrices, a spatially constrained independent component analysis (ICA) was performed at seven different frequency “bins”, after which FNC values and FNC measures of matrix-randomness were assessed using linear mixed models. Results: Results show FNCs at higher-frequency bins display similar randomness to those from the typical frequency bins (0.01−0.15), while the largest values are in the 0.31−0.46 Hz bin. Eyes open (EO) vs eyes closed (EC) comparison found EC was less random than EO across most frequency bins. Further, FNC was greater in EC across auditory and cognitive control pairings while EO values were greater in somatomotor, visual, and default mode FNC. Comparison with existing methods: Effect sizes of frequency and resting-state paradigm vary from small to large, but the most notable results are specific to frequency ranges and resting-state paradigm with artifacts like motion displaying negligible effect sizes. Conclusions: These suggest unique information may be derived from FNC matrices across frequencies and paradigms, but additional data is necessary prior to any definitive conclusions.
AB - Background: Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) is employed to assess “functional connections” of signal between brain regions. However, multiple rs-fMRI paradigms and data-filtering strategies have been used, highlighting the need to explore BOLD signal across the spectrum. Rs-fMRI data is typically filtered at frequencies ranging between 0.008∼0.2 Hz to mitigate nuisance signal (e.g. cardiac, respiratory) and maximize neuronal BOLD signal. However, some argue neuronal BOLD signal may be parsed at higher frequencies. New method: To assess the contributions of rs-fMRI along the BOLD spectra on functional network connectivity (FNC) matrices, a spatially constrained independent component analysis (ICA) was performed at seven different frequency “bins”, after which FNC values and FNC measures of matrix-randomness were assessed using linear mixed models. Results: Results show FNCs at higher-frequency bins display similar randomness to those from the typical frequency bins (0.01−0.15), while the largest values are in the 0.31−0.46 Hz bin. Eyes open (EO) vs eyes closed (EC) comparison found EC was less random than EO across most frequency bins. Further, FNC was greater in EC across auditory and cognitive control pairings while EO values were greater in somatomotor, visual, and default mode FNC. Comparison with existing methods: Effect sizes of frequency and resting-state paradigm vary from small to large, but the most notable results are specific to frequency ranges and resting-state paradigm with artifacts like motion displaying negligible effect sizes. Conclusions: These suggest unique information may be derived from FNC matrices across frequencies and paradigms, but additional data is necessary prior to any definitive conclusions.
KW - Blood-oxygenation-level-dependence
KW - Frequency spectrum analysis
KW - Independent component analysis
KW - Resting-state functional connectivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105316277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105316277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109202
DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109202
M3 - Article
C2 - 33951454
AN - SCOPUS:85105316277
SN - 0165-0270
VL - 358
JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods
M1 - 109202
ER -