TY - JOUR
T1 - Moving from measurement to governance of shared groundwater resources
AU - Schipanski, Meagan E.
AU - Sanderson, Matthew R.
AU - Méndez-Barrientos, Linda Estelí
AU - Kremen, Amy
AU - Gowda, Prasanna
AU - Porter, Dana
AU - Wagner, Kevin
AU - West, Charles
AU - Rice, Charles W.
AU - Marsalis, Mark
AU - Guerrero, Bridget
AU - Haacker, Erin
AU - Dobrowolski, James
AU - Ray, Chittaranjan
AU - Auvermann, Brent
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Limited 2023.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Global groundwater resources are under strain, with cascading effects on producers, food and fibre production systems, communities and ecosystems. Investments in biophysical research have clarified the challenges, catalysed a proliferation of technological solutions and supported incentivizing individual irrigators to adjust practices. However, groundwater management is fundamentally a governance challenge. The reticence to prioritize building governance capacity represents a critical ‘blind spot’ contributing to a low return on investment for research funding with negative consequences for communities moving closer towards resource depletion. In this Perspective, we recommend shifts in research, extension and policy priorities to build polycentric governance capacity and strategic planning tools, and to re-orient priorities to sustaining aquifer-dependent communities in lieu of maximizing agricultural production at the scale of individual farm operations. To achieve these outcomes, groundwater governance needs to be not only prioritized but also democratized.
AB - Global groundwater resources are under strain, with cascading effects on producers, food and fibre production systems, communities and ecosystems. Investments in biophysical research have clarified the challenges, catalysed a proliferation of technological solutions and supported incentivizing individual irrigators to adjust practices. However, groundwater management is fundamentally a governance challenge. The reticence to prioritize building governance capacity represents a critical ‘blind spot’ contributing to a low return on investment for research funding with negative consequences for communities moving closer towards resource depletion. In this Perspective, we recommend shifts in research, extension and policy priorities to build polycentric governance capacity and strategic planning tools, and to re-orient priorities to sustaining aquifer-dependent communities in lieu of maximizing agricultural production at the scale of individual farm operations. To achieve these outcomes, groundwater governance needs to be not only prioritized but also democratized.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152761849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152761849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s44221-022-00008-x
DO - 10.1038/s44221-022-00008-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152761849
SN - 2731-6084
VL - 1
SP - 30
EP - 36
JO - Nature Water
JF - Nature Water
IS - 1
ER -