National identity and the limits of constructivism in international relations theory: a case study of the Suez Canal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Constructivism in most of its variants emphasises the creation of circumstances and the social construction of reality. In international relations theory (IR), it also emphasises the establishment of international regimes. The Suez Canal and its governing regime, established at a high point of European nationalism and imperialism in the nineteenth century, are explored as a test case. I argue that, while the early history of the Canal is illuminated by a constructivist approach, maintenance of the regime to govern it involved military intervention and debt restructuring. Military force, balance of power considerations and economic interests all have to be invoked to explain the later history of the Canal, that is, factors usually stressed by the realist school. A combination of realist and constructivist approaches is recommended. The paper is also critical of certain constructivist concepts of national identity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)478-498
Number of pages21
JournalNations and Nationalism
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Middle East
  • constructivism
  • national identity and foreign policy
  • realism
  • theories of nationalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'National identity and the limits of constructivism in international relations theory: a case study of the Suez Canal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this