Nebraska family practitioners' infant feeding recommendations.

K. G. Auerbach, J. Walburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors conducted an anonymous survey of 220 Nebraska family and general practitioners' attitudes and practice recommendations for infant feeding. Most practitioners' attitudes reflect published American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines regarding using commercial formula for bottle-feeding babies rather than evaporated milk-based formulations. Ninety-two per cent agreed with recommendations relating to the need for fluoride supplementation when fluoride was unavailable in the water supply and 93% agreed that whole cow's milk was inappropriate in the infant's first year. Another 68% felt similarly about evaporated milk formulas. However, 32% of board certified and 53% of nonboard certified physicians continue to believe that early solid foods will reduce night waking. In 80% of the cases, practice recommendations disagreed with AAP guidelines by prescribing vitamin supplements for bottle-feeding babies receiving proprietary infant formulas. Additionally, two-thirds of the practitioners recommended unnecessary water complements and 62% suggested formula supplementation for breastfeeding babies. Solid foods and whole cow's milk for both breastfeeding and bottle-feeding babies often were recommended earlier than the second half of the first year.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-199
Number of pages11
JournalThe Family practice research journal
Volume6
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Nebraska family practitioners' infant feeding recommendations.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this