TY - JOUR
T1 - Neonicotinoid pesticide and nitrate mixture removal and persistence in floating treatment wetlands
AU - Lindgren, Julia K.
AU - Messer, Tiffany L.
AU - Miller, Daniel N.
AU - Snow, Daniel D.
AU - Franti, Thomas G.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported with funds from an NSF ESPCOR grant and the Daughtery Water for Food Global Institute at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. This project was based on research partially supported by the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station with funding from the Hatch capacity funding program (Accession No. 1014685), a Hatch multistate capacity funding grant (W-4045), and of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and USDA-ARS in-house research funds (Project #3042-12630-003-00D). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, or the Daughtery Water for Food Global Foundation. Special thanks to Helen Little and Kenneth Oathout for their support on this project.
Funding Information:
This project was supported with funds from an NSF ESPCOR grant and the Daughtery Water for Food Global Institute at the University of Nebraska‐Lincoln. This project was based on research partially supported by the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station with funding from the Hatch capacity funding program (Accession No. 1014685), a Hatch multistate capacity funding grant (W‐4045), and of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and USDA‐ARS in‐house research funds (Project #3042‐12630‐003‐00D). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, or the Daughtery Water for Food Global Foundation. Special thanks to Helen Little and Kenneth Oathout for their support on this project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Environmental Quality © 2022 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Mesocosm and microcosm experiments were conducted to explore the applicability of floating treatment wetlands (FTWs), an ecologically based management technology, to remove neonicotinoid insecticides and nitrate from surface water. The mesocosm experiment evaluated three treatments in triplicate over a 21-d period. Floating treatment wetland mesocosms completely removed nitrate-N over the course of the experiment even when neonicotinoid insecticides were present. At the completion of the experiment, 79.6% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts and 68.3% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were accounted for in the water column. Approximately 3% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts and 5.0% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were observed in above-surface biomass, while ∼24% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts, particularly desnitro imidacloprid, and <0.1% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were found in the below surface biomass. Further, 1 yr after the experiments, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and degradation byproducts persisted in biomass but at lower concentrations in both the above- and below-surface biomass. Comparing the microbial communities of mature FTWs grown in the presence and absence of neonicotinoids, water column samples had similar low abundances of nitrifying Archaeal and bacterial amoA genes (below detection to 104 ml−1) and denitrifying bacterial nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes (below detection to 105 ml−1). Follow-up laboratory incubations found the highest denitrification potential activities in FTW plant roots compared with water column samples, and there was no effect of neonicotinoid addition (100 ng L−1) on potential denitrification activity. Based on these findings, (a) FTWs remove neonicotinoids from surface water through biomass incorporation, (b) neonicotinoids persist in biomass long-term (>1 yr after exposure), and (c) neonicotinoids do not adversely affect nitrate-N removal via microbial denitrification.
AB - Mesocosm and microcosm experiments were conducted to explore the applicability of floating treatment wetlands (FTWs), an ecologically based management technology, to remove neonicotinoid insecticides and nitrate from surface water. The mesocosm experiment evaluated three treatments in triplicate over a 21-d period. Floating treatment wetland mesocosms completely removed nitrate-N over the course of the experiment even when neonicotinoid insecticides were present. At the completion of the experiment, 79.6% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts and 68.3% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were accounted for in the water column. Approximately 3% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts and 5.0% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were observed in above-surface biomass, while ∼24% of imidacloprid and degradation byproducts, particularly desnitro imidacloprid, and <0.1% of thiamethoxam and degradation byproducts were found in the below surface biomass. Further, 1 yr after the experiments, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and degradation byproducts persisted in biomass but at lower concentrations in both the above- and below-surface biomass. Comparing the microbial communities of mature FTWs grown in the presence and absence of neonicotinoids, water column samples had similar low abundances of nitrifying Archaeal and bacterial amoA genes (below detection to 104 ml−1) and denitrifying bacterial nirK, nirS, and nosZ genes (below detection to 105 ml−1). Follow-up laboratory incubations found the highest denitrification potential activities in FTW plant roots compared with water column samples, and there was no effect of neonicotinoid addition (100 ng L−1) on potential denitrification activity. Based on these findings, (a) FTWs remove neonicotinoids from surface water through biomass incorporation, (b) neonicotinoids persist in biomass long-term (>1 yr after exposure), and (c) neonicotinoids do not adversely affect nitrate-N removal via microbial denitrification.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139913756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139913756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jeq2.20411
DO - 10.1002/jeq2.20411
M3 - Article
C2 - 36201521
AN - SCOPUS:85139913756
VL - 51
SP - 1246
EP - 1258
JO - Journal of Environmental Quality
JF - Journal of Environmental Quality
SN - 0047-2425
IS - 6
ER -