TY - JOUR
T1 - Nitrate removal by floating treatment wetlands amended with spent coffee
T2 - A mesocosm-scale evaluation
AU - Keilhauer, M. G.
AU - Messer, T. L.
AU - Mittelstet, A. R.
AU - Franti, T. G.
AU - Corman, J. R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The Midwestern U.S. is vulnerable to eutrophic conditions from high nutrient concentrations. Floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) are an innovative wetland design for nutrient removal from nonpoint sources and provide a unique in situ treatment. The objectives of this project were to quantify nitrate removal in traditional and carbon-amended FTWs planted with Midwestern plant species during the establishment year. Three greenhouse experiments were conducted throughout the growing season using 18 mesocosms. Two vegetation designs were evaluated: rush species (Juncus effusus and Juncus torreyi) and diverse species (Carex comosa, Carex vulpinoidea, Asclepias incarnata, J. effusus, J. torreyi, and Iris virginica). Spent coffee grounds were applied to 9 of the 18 mesocosms as a carbon amendment. Nitrate-N removal increased during the establishment growing season in the FTW systems (Spring: 15.0% to 17.3%, Summer 1: 82.8% to 92.6%, Summer 2: 86.4% to 94.7%). Nitrate-N removal was also impacted by carbon amendments (FTW without amendment: 82.8% to 94.7%, FTW with amendment: 88.4% to 96.1%). Carbon additions were found to enhance denitrifying conditions even in the absence of FTWs (decreased dissolved oxygen, increased available organic carbon). Significant differences in nitrate-N removal were not observed between FTW vegetation designs. This study provides new insight on the impacts of the growing season, plant species, and carbon amendments on FTW nitrate-N removal performance during the establishment year.
AB - The Midwestern U.S. is vulnerable to eutrophic conditions from high nutrient concentrations. Floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) are an innovative wetland design for nutrient removal from nonpoint sources and provide a unique in situ treatment. The objectives of this project were to quantify nitrate removal in traditional and carbon-amended FTWs planted with Midwestern plant species during the establishment year. Three greenhouse experiments were conducted throughout the growing season using 18 mesocosms. Two vegetation designs were evaluated: rush species (Juncus effusus and Juncus torreyi) and diverse species (Carex comosa, Carex vulpinoidea, Asclepias incarnata, J. effusus, J. torreyi, and Iris virginica). Spent coffee grounds were applied to 9 of the 18 mesocosms as a carbon amendment. Nitrate-N removal increased during the establishment growing season in the FTW systems (Spring: 15.0% to 17.3%, Summer 1: 82.8% to 92.6%, Summer 2: 86.4% to 94.7%). Nitrate-N removal was also impacted by carbon amendments (FTW without amendment: 82.8% to 94.7%, FTW with amendment: 88.4% to 96.1%). Carbon additions were found to enhance denitrifying conditions even in the absence of FTWs (decreased dissolved oxygen, increased available organic carbon). Significant differences in nitrate-N removal were not observed between FTW vegetation designs. This study provides new insight on the impacts of the growing season, plant species, and carbon amendments on FTW nitrate-N removal performance during the establishment year.
KW - Best management practices
KW - Carbon amendment
KW - Floating treatment wetlands
KW - Nitrogen removal
KW - Spent coffee grounds
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078888631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078888631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13031/trans.13431
DO - 10.13031/trans.13431
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078888631
SN - 2151-0032
VL - 62
SP - 1619
EP - 1630
JO - Transactions of the ASABE
JF - Transactions of the ASABE
IS - 6
ER -